2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software defect prediction using stacked denoising autoencoders and two-stage ensemble learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
115
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, xN] = [X1, X2, X3] i.e. P CX where Xi is the submatrix containing the coding coefficients of Pi over C, and xn is the representation coefficients of representing pn with C. the objective function of SDL can be defined as (1) Where r(P, C, X) is a semi-supervised discriminative fidelity term, is the sparsity constraint, and the balance factor is λ. The semisupervised discriminative fidelity term can be defined as For a query module an in P3 , its label can be predicted using equation 3.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, xN] = [X1, X2, X3] i.e. P CX where Xi is the submatrix containing the coding coefficients of Pi over C, and xn is the representation coefficients of representing pn with C. the objective function of SDL can be defined as (1) Where r(P, C, X) is a semi-supervised discriminative fidelity term, is the sparsity constraint, and the balance factor is λ. The semisupervised discriminative fidelity term can be defined as For a query module an in P3 , its label can be predicted using equation 3.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…computer code defect prediction (SDP) technique was planned to designate testing assets sanely, decide the testing want of assorted modules of the computer code, and improve programming quality. By utilizing the implications of SDP, programming specialists will profitably pass judgment on it that computer code modules square measure absolute to be blemished, the conceivable range of imperfections in an exceedingly module or different knowledge known with computer code defects before testing the computer code [1]. Existing SDP studies may be divided into four types: (1) Classification, (2) Regression, (3) Mining association rules, (4) Ranking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mahmood et al, conducted a study of replicability as well as reproducibility of defect prediction in research areas to show the importance of any topic behind the replicability [12]. Tong et al worked on SDP using dual-stage ensembles and encoders [16]. Multi objective effort aware SDP model called as Just in Time(JIT) software defect predictor has been proposed by Chen et al They have used logistic regression to build this JIT software defect predictor [15].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other measures (e.g., AUC and G-measure) that can be used for performance evaluation of dichotomous classifiers. In fact, the F-measure as a comprehensive measurement is a commonly-used evaluation metric in SDP tasks [21,25,26,[35][36][37].…”
Section: The F-measure Might Not Be the Only Appropriate Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%