2007
DOI: 10.1109/mc.2007.362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software-Defined Radio Prospects for Multistandard Mobile Phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in [12] the authors suggest that there are mainly two enabling directions for SDR that could be followed: the first one based on reconfigurable hardware, the second one consists of DSP-centered and accelerator-assisted architectures. The second approach guarantees high flexibility, but also suffers from problems related to high power consumption.…”
Section: Overview Of Existing Sdr Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [12] the authors suggest that there are mainly two enabling directions for SDR that could be followed: the first one based on reconfigurable hardware, the second one consists of DSP-centered and accelerator-assisted architectures. The second approach guarantees high flexibility, but also suffers from problems related to high power consumption.…”
Section: Overview Of Existing Sdr Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aspect of the software-defined radio concept is that flexibility can be delivered through software. An often overlooked corollary is that the hardware performance to support that flexibility is more challenging than for a single-mode implementation, and optimal solutions remain elusive [5]. This section will comment on some of these issues and how they impact on the hardware architecture of software radio platform.…”
Section: Design Criteria For Sdr Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the use of software defined radios is a promising technology to avoid the problem of integration of many different radio transceivers on a device [17]. With the integration Figure 3 Typical simulation result for a cross-layer optimized transmission system (MOS) compared with a conventional throughput optimized system (Throughput) with three application classes (voice, video, ftp) for different symbol rates.…”
Section: Access Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%