Software Quality Models: A Comparative Study

Al-Badareen, Anas Bassam; Selamat, Mohd Hasan; Jabar, Marzanah A.; Din, Jafri; Turaev, Sherzod

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22170-5_4

Cited by 35 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This model defined two layers, highlevel attributes and subordinate attributes. Therefore, this model suffers from lack of criteria for measurement of software quality [15].…”

Section: ) Dromey's Software Quality Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison on Software Quality Models

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Quality that is identified independent of any measurable characteristic is defined as the capability to meet the customer expectations, whether the requirements are explicit or not. A recent innovation in the Systems Area is the development of a set of mechanisms and models for evaluating quality. This article compares the design of a Quality Model with its factors and criteria Different quality models were studied: McCall, Boehm, FURPS, Dromey, and GEQUAMO in an attempt to identify the aspects present in these models that are deemed important in Software Quality. GEQUAMO software quality model is the best among the models compared, since it can be customizable as per requirement in a dynamic and a flexible way.

show abstract

“…This model defined two layers, highlevel attributes and subordinate attributes. Therefore, this model suffers from lack of criteria for measurement of software quality [15].…”

Section: ) Dromey's Software Quality Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison on Software Quality Models

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples of these models include McCall quality model, Boehm's quality model, Dromey's quality model, and ISO 9126. All these models are discussed in Al‐Badareen, Selamat, Jabar, Din, and Turaev (). More recently, a new standard (ISO/IEC 25010) has been developed as an evolution of ISO 9126.…”

Section: Background and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

An ontology to document a quality scheme specification of a software product

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pressman's (2010) definition of software quality is the conformance to explicitly stated functional and performance requirements, explicitly documented development standards, and implicit characteristics that are expected of all professionally developed software. The achievement of quality is a complex activity that is related with the process quality and product quality. However, still, it is not clear how product quality should apply in the development process. Frequently, the development team does not know what characteristics influence a specific entity and how these characteristics compose the quality of the product. This lack of knowledge reflects the need to define some document that serve as a valid quality specification that should be evaluated along the development process. This contribution addresses this need by introducing an ontology for document a quality scheme based on the product quality model of ISO/IEC 25010. The proposal follows this model with aims to clarify the properties that are normally present in a product and its meaning. The ontology incorporates the metric concept to represent the way in which quality should be measure. The ontology was implemented using Protégé, and it was evaluated using a set of metrics that estimate the required structural characteristics.

show abstract

“…Developer View). Quality's criteria associated with a set of quality metrics are defined and used to provide a scale and method for measurement [6]. The factors and criteria are shown in table 1.…”

Section: Mccall's Quality Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%