2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil carbon and nitrogen content and stabilization in mid-rotation, intensively managed sweetgum and loblolly pine stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study found no effect of stand age or biomass accumulation on any soil C parameter using a chronosequence approach. These results are similar to reports from other southern pine plantations where little (Richter et al, 1999) or no increase in soil C was detectable over time (Markewitz et al, 2002;Johnson et al, 2003;Johnsen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Soc and Stand Agesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present study found no effect of stand age or biomass accumulation on any soil C parameter using a chronosequence approach. These results are similar to reports from other southern pine plantations where little (Richter et al, 1999) or no increase in soil C was detectable over time (Markewitz et al, 2002;Johnson et al, 2003;Johnsen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Soc and Stand Agesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relatively higher C input to the A1 horizon reflected a substantial contribution from aboveground litter to Cnew, as also indicated by the different  13 C signatures of the fLF and the roots (Table 2). Decreases in C and N concentration with depth have been reported previously (e.g., Johnsen et al 2013;Ostrowska & Porębska 2012) and are probably due to a lower SOM input (lower Cnew) in the A2 horizon combined with a different quality of the SOM entering the soil (Bowden et al 2014). The increases in C:N ratios of the oLF and fLF with depth were probably due to concurrent increases in the C:N ratio of the roots but could also originate from higher concentration of recalcitrant compounds (Brunn et al 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Soil Depth On Som Turnoversupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Highly productive sites can retain large quantities of soil C as well as support stands with higher productivity, and soil C and consequently ecosystem C were related to SI in this study. Pinus taeda planted on former agricultural land in southwest Georgia contained 268 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.3 m of soil (Johnsen et al 2013) and a Pinus taeda plantation in the coastal plain of South Carolina contained 171 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.6 m (Maier et al 2012). Thus, soil C in the present study (32-98 Mg C/ha) was lower than values reported for highly productive sites.…”
Section: Density and Ecosystem Ccontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Pinus taeda planted on former agricultural land in southwest Georgia contained 268 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.3 m of soil (Johnsen et al 2013) and a Pinus taeda plantation in the coastal plain of South Carolina contained 171 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.6 m (Maier et al 2012). Highly productive sites can retain large quantities of soil C as well as support stands with higher productivity, and soil C and consequently ecosystem C were related to SI in this study.…”
Section: Density and Ecosystem Cmentioning
confidence: 57%