2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2016-0141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil changes over 12 years of conventional vs. conservation management on irrigated rotations in southern Alberta

Abstract: Increased irrigated production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in southern Alberta in the 1990s prompted a 12 yr (2000-2011) study to evaluate conservation (CONS) management practices for these crops in 3-6 yr rotations. Conservation management included reduced tillage, cover crops, compost, and narrow-row dry bean. After 12 yr, soil organic carbon (SOC) at 0-30 cm depth increased by 0.48 Mg ha −1 yr −1 on a 5 yr CONS rotation, in line with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, a narrow range of soil EC was observed among the crop rotations (Table 2). The higher amount of Na after sugar beet, compared with other crop phase, could be related to the sugar beet's deep root nutrients extract causing the soil nutrients to move up to the near surface layers (Larney et al., 2017). The inclusion of sugar beet in C–DB–C–SB rotation could reduce the advantage of continuous NT practice in maintaining surface residue due to soil disturbance during sugar beet harvest, up to 20‐cm, every fourth year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, a narrow range of soil EC was observed among the crop rotations (Table 2). The higher amount of Na after sugar beet, compared with other crop phase, could be related to the sugar beet's deep root nutrients extract causing the soil nutrients to move up to the near surface layers (Larney et al., 2017). The inclusion of sugar beet in C–DB–C–SB rotation could reduce the advantage of continuous NT practice in maintaining surface residue due to soil disturbance during sugar beet harvest, up to 20‐cm, every fourth year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12‐yr study concluded after harvest in fall 2011, with the number of completed rotation cycles ranging from four (3‐CONV, 3‐CONS) to two (6‐CONS) (Table 1). In fall 2011, a final set of soil samples was taken for nutrient analyses on all plots (Larney et al., 2017a). Available P levels throughout the study were nonlimiting to plant growth (Larney et al., 2017a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fall 2011, a final set of soil samples was taken for nutrient analyses on all plots (Larney et al., 2017a). Available P levels throughout the study were nonlimiting to plant growth (Larney et al., 2017a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific objectives of this study were to assess SWS wheat yield and quality in 3-5 yr irrigated rotations with dry bean, potato, and sugar beet under CONV or CONS soil management over 12 yr. The effects of rotation and soil management on dry bean (Larney et al 2015), potato (Larney et al 2016b), and sugar beet (Larney et al 2016a) performance and soil quality (Li et al 2015;Larney et al 2017a;Lupwayi et al 2017aLupwayi et al , 2017b have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%