1937
DOI: 10.2307/1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Communities in Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1939
1939
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the early studies involved digging up soil samples and sorting these by hand (Stockli, 1928), and indeed many workers still use this method, except that they take cores or quadrats of soil of exact dimensions to enable accurate population estimates to be made. Workers who have estimated populations by handsorting include Bretscher (1896), Bornebusch (1930), Ford (1935), Hopp (1947), Reynoldson (1955), Low (1955), Svendsen (1955), Wilcke (1955), , Van Rhee and Nathans (1961), El- Duweini and Ghabbour (1965). compared the efficiency of samples of sizes 0·06, 0·25, 0·5 and 1·0 m 2 , taken with a square sampling tool, for estimating populations of earthworms by handsorting.…”
Section: Handsortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the early studies involved digging up soil samples and sorting these by hand (Stockli, 1928), and indeed many workers still use this method, except that they take cores or quadrats of soil of exact dimensions to enable accurate population estimates to be made. Workers who have estimated populations by handsorting include Bretscher (1896), Bornebusch (1930), Ford (1935), Hopp (1947), Reynoldson (1955), Low (1955), Svendsen (1955), Wilcke (1955), , Van Rhee and Nathans (1961), El- Duweini and Ghabbour (1965). compared the efficiency of samples of sizes 0·06, 0·25, 0·5 and 1·0 m 2 , taken with a square sampling tool, for estimating populations of earthworms by handsorting.…”
Section: Handsortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early soil faunal studies it was suggested that soil arthropods were mainly confined to the upper few inches of sml (THOMPSON, 1924), (FORD, 1935), and early workers on the Symphyla also made this assumption (NewPORT, 1845), (GRAsSI, 1886), (HANSEN, 1903), (FRIEDEL, 1928). Later work (DIEM, 1903), (EDWARDS, E. E. 1929), (SALT, HOLtlCK, RAW & BRAIN, 1948) showed symphylids to be very common at much lower levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%