2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil microbial community structure and function relationships: A heat stress experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
52
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
7
52
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be argued that microbes are more efficient in a certain range of temperatures (Barcenas‐Moreno et al ., ) and beyond this range could have negative impact on microbial growth. The reduction in bacterial abundance and diversity by high temperatures was consistent with previous studies as temperature is the main climatic factor that influences bacteria (Allison and Treseder, ; Riah‐Anglet et al ., ; Wu et al ., ). Considering home temperatures of three provenances, soil microbes linked to provenances from cooler origin (temperate provenance), were better acclimatized to warming than to soil microbes linked to provenances from warmer origin (subtropical and tropical provenance) which were probably approaching their thermal limits and may be negatively influenced by warming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that microbes are more efficient in a certain range of temperatures (Barcenas‐Moreno et al ., ) and beyond this range could have negative impact on microbial growth. The reduction in bacterial abundance and diversity by high temperatures was consistent with previous studies as temperature is the main climatic factor that influences bacteria (Allison and Treseder, ; Riah‐Anglet et al ., ; Wu et al ., ). Considering home temperatures of three provenances, soil microbes linked to provenances from cooler origin (temperate provenance), were better acclimatized to warming than to soil microbes linked to provenances from warmer origin (subtropical and tropical provenance) which were probably approaching their thermal limits and may be negatively influenced by warming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of microbial communities is determined by the microbes composing them (Yasuda et al ., ; Fierer et al ., ; Riah‐Anglet et al ., ). Nitrogen fertilization is a main driver of microbial community structure, which deeply altered the abundance profile of N metabolism genes in this long‐term study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Smith () defined a climate extreme as a statistically rare event that can ‘alter ecosystem structure and/or function well outside the bounds of what is considered typical or normal variability’. Research based on extreme events has already yielded insights into belowground dynamics (Evans & Wallenstein, ), but these experiments have largely been carried out using laboratory soil incubations (Barcenas‐Moreno et al ., ; Riah‐Anglet et al ., ), thus separating linkages between vegetation and soil microbes. Important questions remain about the relevance of the plant–soil–microorganism carbon continuum in extreme climate event scenarios, including at which point (i.e., threshold) is the plant–soil–microorganism connectivity lost?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Observations and syntheses of microbial community response to climate change, including drying and warming, are emerging; however, resolving stress‐response strategies of microorganisms remains an ongoing challenge in environmental microbiology (Schimel et al ., ; Lennon et al ., ; Evans & Wallenstein, ). For example, fungi have been shown to have a high tolerance for water stress, often attributed to their ability to spatially explore the soil better for water and nutrients (Frey et al ., ; Riah‐Anglet et al ., ). Additionally, due to their differences in cell wall structure, fungi and gram‐positive bacteria (which have a thick, interlinked peptidoglycan cell wall) are considered to have wide niche breadths with respect to soil moisture ranges and a stronger tolerance to desiccation (Schimel et al ., ; Lennon et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%