2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0693-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil microstructure as an under-explored feature of biological soil crust hydrological properties: case study from the NW Negev Desert

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 by Chamizo et al). In the northwest Negev Desert, Felde et al (2014) showed that biocrust developmental stage greatly affected the soil pore system and influenced water redistribution. In the context of climate change, these patterns show biocrust composition and cover could play a critical role in affecting soil moisture and mitigating (or exacerbating) dryland soil moisture responses to climate change.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 by Chamizo et al). In the northwest Negev Desert, Felde et al (2014) showed that biocrust developmental stage greatly affected the soil pore system and influenced water redistribution. In the context of climate change, these patterns show biocrust composition and cover could play a critical role in affecting soil moisture and mitigating (or exacerbating) dryland soil moisture responses to climate change.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surface is gradually covered by deposits, top crust organisms tend to move upward and recolonize at the new surface (e.g. Garcia-Pichel and Pringault, 2001;Jia et al, 2008), leaving old materials buried into the subcrust (Felde et al, 2014). On the other hand, the debris left to soil surface is exposed to photodegradation.…”
Section: J Gong Et Al: Modelling the Diurnal And Seasonal Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C sequestration of biocrust can be strongly modified by microbial communities directly (Belnap et al, 2003;Pointing and Belnap, 2012;Feng et al, 2014;Maestre et al, 2015) and through other factors, e.g. surface albedo (Chamizo et al, 2012), dew falls (Liu et al, 2006) and soil pore formation (Williams et al, 2012;Felde et al, 2014). So far, many questions remain unanswered about the mechanisms that control the colonization, adaption and succession of microbial communities and the structure function of biocrust (Pointing and Belnap, 2012).…”
Section: Modelling Uncertainties and Future Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9.2e, h). A study on the impact of burial in the Hopq desert, China, found that if the thickness of burial by sand does not exceed a threshold of 1 cm, it can actually promote a structuring process by applying selective stress on the biocrust organisms that favors mobile genera (e.g., Microcoleus) (Rao et al 2012), which can move upward to the new surface, thereby creating new surface layers (Felde et al 2014). However, if the sand burial height exceeds this threshold, the biocrust is severely damaged (Rao et al 2012) and may not be able to recover.…”
Section: Mechanical Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%