2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(13)60080-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Organic Carbon Transformation and Related Properties in Urban Soil Under Impervious Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
56
6
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
56
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOC stocks to 20-cm depth of green space soils in Nanjing City were 45.2 Mg C ha -1 and, thus, higher than those of impervious-covered soils (23.5 Mg C ha -1 ; Wei et al, 2014). It was hypothesized that reduced C input (e.g., with plant litter, manure) and the removal of the original SOC-rich arable soil layer resulted in lower SOC stocks of impervious-covered soils (Wei et al, 2014).…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SOC stocks to 20-cm depth of green space soils in Nanjing City were 45.2 Mg C ha -1 and, thus, higher than those of impervious-covered soils (23.5 Mg C ha -1 ; Wei et al, 2014). It was hypothesized that reduced C input (e.g., with plant litter, manure) and the removal of the original SOC-rich arable soil layer resulted in lower SOC stocks of impervious-covered soils (Wei et al, 2014).…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It was hypothesized that reduced C input (e.g., with plant litter, manure) and the removal of the original SOC-rich arable soil layer resulted in lower SOC stocks of impervious-covered soils (Wei et al, 2014).…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Wei et al. ), and (3) assume zero C under non‐building impervious (a common assumption for urban areas, and the most conservative possible bound). For P under non‐building impervious surfaces, we considered two alternatives: (1) assume equivalent soil P as in non‐impervious surfaces (consistent with Wei et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbance of the diluted samples was read on a split beam spectrophotometer at 565 nm. Water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and basal respiration were analyzed according to Wei et al (2014), with a minor modification. The soil sample (15 g of 2 mm sieved) was mixed with 30 mL of distilled water, shaken for 2 h at 25°C, and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min.…”
Section: Soil Property Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%