1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199703)26:3<337::aid-eqe646>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil-Pile-Bridge Seismic Interaction: Kinematic and Inertial Effects. Part I: Soft Soil

Abstract: A substructuring method has been implemented for the seismic analysis of bridge piers founded on vertical piles and pile groups in multi-layered soil. The method reproduces semi-analytically both the kinematic and inertial soil-structure interaction, in a simple realistic way. Vertical S-wave propagation and the pile-to-pile interplay are treated with sufficient rigor, within the realm of equivalent-linear soil behaviour, while a variety of support conditions of the bridge deck on the pier can be studied with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of analysis (Mylonakis et al, 1997) is schematically illustrated in Fig 5. As previously mentioned, the mass of the superstructure is concentrated at the top of the pier, and the pier is modeled as a beam. The soilcaisson interaction is reproduced through the dynamic impedances computed in the previous subsection.…”
Section: Inertial and Total Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of analysis (Mylonakis et al, 1997) is schematically illustrated in Fig 5. As previously mentioned, the mass of the superstructure is concentrated at the top of the pier, and the pier is modeled as a beam. The soilcaisson interaction is reproduced through the dynamic impedances computed in the previous subsection.…”
Section: Inertial and Total Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the sharp soil stiffness contrast at the level of the clay-sand interface (z = 6 m), the peak bending moment occurs close to the pilehead. This should be attributed to inertial loading transmitted directly to the single pile foundation as a shear force and bending moment during superstructure oscillations (Mylonakis et al 1997;Wilson 1998). Note also that the depth where the maximum bending moment occurs increases with increasing peak base acceleration.…”
Section: Typical Sets Of Recorded and Computed Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, kinematic interaction accounts for the scattering of the incoming waves by the foundation as the result of its inability to conform to the displacement profile imposed by the vibration of the soil. In such a case, the displacement of the pile head (or the cap of the pile group) U 11 冒0脼 is related to that of the free-field surface U ff 冒0脼 through the kinematic interaction factor C, which is a measure of the effect of the foundation presence on dynamic soil response [15]:…”
Section: Asynchronous Excitation and Kinematic Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) is close to zero [14], hence naturally, the potential effect of rotational excitation is negligible [15]. Recent has revealed cases [14] where the rotation of the pile group, might have a considerable effect on the seismic demand of the superstructure, particularly in cases of inhomogeneous soil formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%