2002
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2624(200210)165:5<618::aid-jpln618>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil properties of drained and rewetted fen soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This gradient develops over time because of increasing drainage intensity (large-scale, chronic disturbance), leading to shifts in abiotic conditions through physical and chemical changes in the peat body (Okruszko et al 1999;Zeitz and Velty 2002;Okruszko and Ilnicki 2003). The endpoint of this process is the formation of a substrate with little capillary water rise and almost no water storage capacity (Okruszko 1957;Kajak and Okruszko 1990), leading to water shortage in the rooting zone during the dry season.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This gradient develops over time because of increasing drainage intensity (large-scale, chronic disturbance), leading to shifts in abiotic conditions through physical and chemical changes in the peat body (Okruszko et al 1999;Zeitz and Velty 2002;Okruszko and Ilnicki 2003). The endpoint of this process is the formation of a substrate with little capillary water rise and almost no water storage capacity (Okruszko 1957;Kajak and Okruszko 1990), leading to water shortage in the rooting zone during the dry season.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, high nitrate concentrations in the porewater of drained peatlands are caused by the aeration of the peat and subsequent mineralisation and nitrification of organic nitrogen (Holden et al, 2004;Olde Venterink et al, 2002;Sapek et al, 2007). These processes will be particularly intensive in the case of low groundwater levels (Hacin et al, 2011;Martin et al, 1997) and of high amplitudes of the groundwater level fluctuations, which are typical of degraded peatlands due to the altered hydraulic properties of the peat (Zeitz and Velty, 2002). Nitrogen supply by fertilisation or atmospheric deposition can enhance mineralisation (Ross et al, 1995;Verhoeven et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Nowadays, the majority of the peatlands in Germany are used as grassland (UBA, 2012). Lowering the groundwater table by drainage leads to deleterious effects such as peat degradation (Zeitz and Velty, 2002); loss of biodiversity (Succow and Joosten, 2001); and high emissions of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (Höper, 2002;Limpens et al, 2008;UBA, 2012). Furthermore, the water-purifying function of lowland peatlands is lost as drainage frequently turns them from a nutrient sink into a nutrient source (Holden et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least on alkaline peat, a rewetting of the soils will reduce the availability of phosphorous and potassium (Koppisch et al 2001) and thus will counteract the observed nutrient enrichment. In Germany on formerly fertilised acidic peat an opposite effect of rewetting was observed: the availability of phosphorous increased (Rupp et al 2004;Zeitz and Velty 2002). But we think, that this situation will hardly occur in Switzerland: here the mire sites which are nature reserves used to be treated rather as waste land by the farmers and they were never fertilized.…”
Section: Conclusion For Nature Conservationmentioning
confidence: 87%