1998
DOI: 10.1007/s003740050429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil respiration and carbon balance of gray forest soils as affected by land use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with many of the reported studies on soil respiration in different land-use systems (Houghton 1999) and is consistent with current knowledge that under agricultural cultivation, soil C can be lost very quickly (Monreal and Janzen 1993). However, higher soil respiration rates in forested sites than in cropland have also been reported (Larionova et al 1998). Soil respiration rates can be controlled by many different factors, such as disturbance (Joshi et al 1991;VandenBygaart et al 2003), plant species composition (Joshi et al 1991;Salimon et al 2004), climatic conditions (Schimel et al 1994;Yuste et al 2003), root respiration (Bond-Lamberty et al 2004), and management input (VandenBygaart et al 2003;Merino et al 2004).…”
Section: Soil Respiration In a Chronosequence Of Hybrid Poplar Plantasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with many of the reported studies on soil respiration in different land-use systems (Houghton 1999) and is consistent with current knowledge that under agricultural cultivation, soil C can be lost very quickly (Monreal and Janzen 1993). However, higher soil respiration rates in forested sites than in cropland have also been reported (Larionova et al 1998). Soil respiration rates can be controlled by many different factors, such as disturbance (Joshi et al 1991;VandenBygaart et al 2003), plant species composition (Joshi et al 1991;Salimon et al 2004), climatic conditions (Schimel et al 1994;Yuste et al 2003), root respiration (Bond-Lamberty et al 2004), and management input (VandenBygaart et al 2003;Merino et al 2004).…”
Section: Soil Respiration In a Chronosequence Of Hybrid Poplar Plantasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The CO 2 emission rates observed in the uncut soil were comparable to other forest systems where similar analytical methodologies were used [5,20]. Harvesting led to considerable increases in CO 2 emissions, although the effect varied greatly with the post-harvesting management.…”
Section: Co 2 Fluxessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Gas-tight chambers (19.5 cm high, 29.5 cm diameter) were fixed on the frames. Measurements were taken between 10 and 12 h, because soil respiration at this time of the day can be used to estimate the mean daily rate of respiration [20]. Surface plant cover was cut before measurements were made.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Laboratory Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean annual CO 2 emission of cereal fields was estimated to range from 0.75 (DC) to 1.14 (SC) Mg C ha -1 . This estimated value is the same level as that for the Canadian prairie (de Jong 1974), while it was lower than for Eurasian Chernozem 8,18 . Mean annual CO 2 emission of fallow and meadow fields was estimated to range from 0.71 (DC) to 0.92 (SC) Mg C ha -1 and from 0.61 (DC) to 1.34 (OC) Mg C ha…”
Section: Prediction Of Co 2 Emissionmentioning
confidence: 42%