2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil scarification favors natural regeneration of Pinus pinea in Lebanon forests: Evidences from field and laboratory experiments

Abstract: Pinus pinea is an important species for ecological and economic reasons in the Mediterranean area and especially in Lebanon. However, conditions of its natural regeneration have received little attention. Our study aimed to test the influence of soil disturbances, predation and autotoxicity on pine regeneration. A seed sowing field experiment was conducted in a mature stand in which two types of soil disturbances were tested (soil scarification and litter burning) in presence or absence of predation. In additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil scarification is a commonly used ‘close to nature’ forest management method that assists the natural regeneration of woody plants in various forest biomes, with widespread research globally, including Europe (Hynynen et al , 2010; Nilsson et al , 2010; Jäärats et al , 2012), the United States (Woolley et al , 2012), and Canada (Beaudry et al , 1997; Giasson et al , 2006), with recent reports from South–Central Chile (Soto and Puettmann, 2018), Lebanon (Nakhoul et al , 2020), and Japan (Umeki, 2003). Globally, the concept of ‘close to nature’ has garnered attention, and it aims to reconcile wood production and ecological resilience (Messier et al , 2013; O’Hara, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil scarification is a commonly used ‘close to nature’ forest management method that assists the natural regeneration of woody plants in various forest biomes, with widespread research globally, including Europe (Hynynen et al , 2010; Nilsson et al , 2010; Jäärats et al , 2012), the United States (Woolley et al , 2012), and Canada (Beaudry et al , 1997; Giasson et al , 2006), with recent reports from South–Central Chile (Soto and Puettmann, 2018), Lebanon (Nakhoul et al , 2020), and Japan (Umeki, 2003). Globally, the concept of ‘close to nature’ has garnered attention, and it aims to reconcile wood production and ecological resilience (Messier et al , 2013; O’Hara, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter cover provides some suitable conditions for seed germination, and these conditions are key to seed germination (Sonkoly et al, 2020). On the positive side, litter protects seeds from herbivores (Hu et al, 2016; Nakhoul et al, 2020), enables seed germination by controlling soil temperature fluctuations (Xia et al, 2015), alleviates seed desiccation by shielding the soil surface from ultraviolet light (Visscher et al, 2016) and promotes seed vigour by creating water diffusion barriers for dry grasslands and microclimates for shady forests (Chen, Ma, et al, 2018; Ruprecht et al, 2010). Conversely, litter input can also make certain constraints stronger, such as negatively impacting seeds by placing them in deep shade or darkness (Rotundo & Aguiar, 2005), or by releasing allelochemicals from coniferous (Kainulainen et al, 2003) and broadleaved litter (Lang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter cover provides some suitable conditions for seed germination, and these conditions are key to seed germination (Sonkoly et al, 2020). On the positive side, litter protects seeds from herbivores (Hu et al, 2016;Nakhoul et al, 2020), enables seed germination by controlling soil temperature fluctuations (Xia et al, 2015), alleviates seed desiccation by shielding the soil surface from ultraviolet light (Visscher et al, 2016) and promotes seed vigour by creating water diffusion barriers for dry grasslands and microclimates for shady forests (Chen, Ma, et al, 2018;Ruprecht et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%