2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil spectroscopy with the use of chemometrics, machine learning and pre-processing techniques in soil diagnosis: Recent advances–A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(140 reference statements)
2
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several different algorithms have been used for preprocessing of spectral data. Commonly used preprocessing algorithms include moving averages, binning, smoothing such as Savitzky-Golay filtering, normalization, continuum removal, derivatives, gap derivatives, multiplicative scatter and SNV computation [20][21][22][23]. Savitzky-Golay is a smoothing function which reduces noise by using a weighted sum of neighboring values, while derivatives remove additive or multiplicative effects between spectra [20].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several different algorithms have been used for preprocessing of spectral data. Commonly used preprocessing algorithms include moving averages, binning, smoothing such as Savitzky-Golay filtering, normalization, continuum removal, derivatives, gap derivatives, multiplicative scatter and SNV computation [20][21][22][23]. Savitzky-Golay is a smoothing function which reduces noise by using a weighted sum of neighboring values, while derivatives remove additive or multiplicative effects between spectra [20].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of models are used in spectral predictions; statistical-based models and machine learning-based or algorithmic models [24]. Research comparing combination of preprocessing and modeling algorithms on single spectral dataset for prediction of various soil properties are very rare and mostly studying SOC or soil clay content [21,23,25,26]. Statistical-based models are based on assumptions made by the user; while machine learning models are data driven and learn from the data set without the user assuming any parameters [27].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral prediction models established using RF and ANN algorithms could estimate the SOM content in red soil plantations. In addition, PLSR, RF, SVM, and ANN are the four modeling methods shown to have excellent performance in studies on the establishment of hyperspectral prediction models [20,51,67,68], among which PLSR is the most extensively applied linear fitting method [29]. However, the relationship between the SOM content in an area and related spectral features should be more complex than a simple linear relationship.…”
Section: Comparison Of Linear and Non-linear Modeling Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing the state-of-the-art literature, it is evident that exploring the most suitable band selection and selecting the appropriate combination of modeling methods are still the key problems in the field of hyperspectral prediction modeling of soil properties. ML techniques have proved to be effective in dealing with large amounts of soil spectral variables [26][27][28][29]. The techniques mentioned above have been applied to obtain prediction models of soil properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the development of fast, low cost, reproducible and portable instruments available for infrared techniques (medium and near infrared) have opened new opportunities for researchers to benefit of their capabilities, especially when combined with multivariate calibrations. The latter have shown to be powerful tools to develop quantitative and qualitative models in many fields including soil 6 10 , food 11 , 12 pharmaceutics 13 and petroleum 14 18 analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%