2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2022.105469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil structure changes induced by tillage and reduction of machinery traffic on sugarcane – A diversity of assessment scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mechanized intervention cost was higher than NT and MT management, as it required less intensity using machines. Luz et al [7] found similar results, indicating traditional soil management does not benefit to alleviate compaction when compared to a conservationist system. According to Souza et al [15], soil preparation is a high-cost operation in sugarcane renovation fields, and results from soil preparation are not maintained during the crop cycle; this occurs due to heavy machine traffic and rearrangement of soil particles in wheel interaction (Marques Filho et al) [16] and weathering agents such as rain and wind [18].…”
Section: Soil Resistance Penetration In Rowsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the mechanized intervention cost was higher than NT and MT management, as it required less intensity using machines. Luz et al [7] found similar results, indicating traditional soil management does not benefit to alleviate compaction when compared to a conservationist system. According to Souza et al [15], soil preparation is a high-cost operation in sugarcane renovation fields, and results from soil preparation are not maintained during the crop cycle; this occurs due to heavy machine traffic and rearrangement of soil particles in wheel interaction (Marques Filho et al) [16] and weathering agents such as rain and wind [18].…”
Section: Soil Resistance Penetration In Rowsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this soil layer, the average resistances were MT (1.48 MPa), CT (1.39 MPa) and Ctrl (1.04 MPa). Luz et al [7] stated that conservationist tillage alone could not preserve the physical soil structure so other management practices are necessary. Lima et al [6] showed that lower SPR might not be related to greater volume roots in sugarcane; however, the machines' transit lines present a 35% reduction in root volume.…”
Section: Soil Resistance Penetration In Rowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained through this method are immediately available, allowing the ranchers to be aware of the soil state and its vulnerability without needing extended training or specialized knowledge. Previous studies conducted in different parts of the world show the capacity of VESS to reveal differences between land use types and management options (Da Luz et al., 2022; Gutknecht et al., 2023; Mutuku et al., 2021; Purnama et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%