2011
DOI: 10.1002/gea.20367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soils and late‐Quaternary landscape evolution in the Cottonwood River basin, east‐central Kansas: Implications for archaeological research

Abstract: Temporal and spatial patterns of landscape evolution strongly influence the temporal and spatial patterns of the archaeological record in drainage systems. In this geoarchaeological investigation we took a basin-wide approach in assessing the soil stratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, and geochronology of alluvial deposits and associated buried soils in the Cottonwood River basin of east-central Kansas. Patterns of landscape evolution emerge when stratigraphic sequences and radiocarbon chronologies are compared by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, according to Liu (:26), Middle Neolithic Yangshao sites in “these areas [Central Plains of Henan] are small and scattered, and tend to be located on relatively high ground.” We argue that this pattern is as likely a result of rapid alluviation as it is a real reflection of human settlement in the region. Thus, full‐coverage regional settlement survey methods and objectives (Kowalewski, ; Underhill et al., ) need to be carefully considered and geoarchaeological knowledge of these environments must be factored in to any understanding of the distribution of human settlements (see also Jing, Rapp, & Gao, ; Beeton & Mandel, ; Maher, ; and Nials, Gregory, & Hill, for similar examples in China and elsewhere).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, according to Liu (:26), Middle Neolithic Yangshao sites in “these areas [Central Plains of Henan] are small and scattered, and tend to be located on relatively high ground.” We argue that this pattern is as likely a result of rapid alluviation as it is a real reflection of human settlement in the region. Thus, full‐coverage regional settlement survey methods and objectives (Kowalewski, ; Underhill et al., ) need to be carefully considered and geoarchaeological knowledge of these environments must be factored in to any understanding of the distribution of human settlements (see also Jing, Rapp, & Gao, ; Beeton & Mandel, ; Maher, ; and Nials, Gregory, & Hill, for similar examples in China and elsewhere).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human occupation of archaeological sites can be dated by relative or numerical methods based on artifacts, architecture, and/or stratigraphic records. Numerical ages are often obtained from radiocarbon dating of organic materials embedded in sedimentary deposits or of those that were used for construction (Beeton & Mandel, ; Broothaerts et al., ). For example, wood beams employed in the construction of a ceiling can provide information on the age of construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quartz‐rich sediments in lacustrine and low energy fluvial systems (Fiebig et al., ; Rhodes, ) can be very suitable for OSL dating. Recently, OSL has been used to date lime mortars used in historical constructions (Goedicke, , ; Beeton & Mandel, ; Stella et al., ; Kraushaar et al., ; Urbanova et al., ), and has great potential for geoarchaeological studies (Woodward et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In southern Indiana (Figure 1), upland sites usually occur in severely eroded contexts and provide little in situ information. Such sites are typically either destroyed through erosion during drainage basin development or deeply buried and not visible today (Monaghan & Lovis, 2005;Bettis, Benn, & Hajic, 2008;Guccione, 2008;Beeton & Mandel, 2011). Such sites are typically either destroyed through erosion during drainage basin development or deeply buried and not visible today (Monaghan & Lovis, 2005;Bettis, Benn, & Hajic, 2008;Guccione, 2008;Beeton & Mandel, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riverine landscapes, including glaciofluvial terraces, offer better potential for intact deposits but have also been extensively altered by postglacial geomorphic processes. Such sites are typically either destroyed through erosion during drainage basin development or deeply buried and not visible today (Monaghan & Lovis, 2005;Bettis, Benn, & Hajic, 2008;Guccione, 2008;Beeton & Mandel, 2011). Although Paleoindian sites within buried contexts may be the most interesting, preserved, undisturbed surface sites are also important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%