Solar photovoltaic panels significantly promote vegetation recovery by modifying the soil surface microhabitats in an arid sandy ecosystem

Abstract

The arid sandy areas have great potential for producing solar power, and a large number of solar photovoltaic (PV) power (SPP) stations have been set‐up in these regions across the world. Construction of SPP at large scale certainly changes the land surface with consequences on the local ecosystem. However, few studies have focused on these impacts. This study explored the influence of SPP on vegetation by modifying microhabitats. The soil water content (SWC), evaporation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), soil and air temperature (AT), vegetation coverage, biomass, and species richness were measured under different positions of the SPP and outside. The results showed that SWC in the station was much higher than that observed outside the SPP, and the evaporation in the SPP was lower than outside (P < .05). The PAR below the PV panel line zone is much lower than the interval (IT) zone. The surface coverage, biomass, and species richness were significantly higher in the SPP than outside the IT zone and outside the SPP (P < .05). The AT under the panel was 1.67 times lower than above during the plant growing season. The microhabitat index has a high correlation with biomass, coverage, and species richness. PV panels could impact microhabitat in arid sandy areas and accelerate vegetation recovery progress and quality. The SPP construction would not only supply clean energy but also bring unintended ecological benefits in the future.

Capital Costs for Dual-Use Photovoltaic Installations: 2020 Benchmark for Ground-Mounted PV Systems with Pollinator-Friendly Vegetation, Grazing, and Crops

“…Early studies also suggest that agrivoltaics installations could also provide other benefits. For example, water usage for some crops and grasses appears to decrease when the crops are located below PV panels, with greater water savings achieved in arid regions (Elnaz Hassanpour Adeh, Selker, and Higgins 2018;Liu et al 2019;Elamri et al 2018;Barron-Gafford et al 2019). One study found that PV panels with crops grown below were on average 8.9 ℃ cooler during daylight hours than panels without crops.…”

Texture Is Important in Improving the Accuracy of Mapping Photovoltaic Power Plants: A Case Study of Ningxia Autonomous Region, China

“…However, PV power plants are a mixture of PV arrays, shadows, and different types of soil or vegetation [14]. The mixture inevitably leads to PV power plants having similar spectrums with other objects on a pixel scale over large regions [27,31].…”

“…Utility-scale PV power plants caused many potential environmental impacts during the process of construction and operation. The environmental impacts include changes in local microclimate [7][8][9][10][11], changes in albedo [1,12,13], changes in vegetation cover [14,15], land use and land cover change [16,17], and impacts on habitat biodiversity [18,19]. The construction of PV power plants in various landscapes, such as desert, mountain, coast, lake [20][21][22], has also led to the differences in their environmental effects.…”

Impacts of Large‐Scale Sahara Solar Farms on Global Climate and Vegetation Cover

“…Indeed, both on-site (e.g. Barron-Gafford et al, 2016;Grodsky & Hernandez, 2020;Liu et al, 2019) and satellite (e.g. Zhang & Xu, 2020) observations have shown complex and location-dependent changes to the microclimates and shifts in local ecosystems after the construction of desert solar farms across the world.…”