“…In addition, the redox mediator (O 2 /H 2 O) of our system (pH-neutral natural seawater) (Li et al., 2017) is nature friendly compared with existing SRCs, such as I − /I 3− (light absorber—N179/TiO 2 , Yu et al., 2014; TiO 2 , Li et al., 2016b; Fe 2 O 3 , Nikiforidis et al., 2016) and VO 2 + /VO 2+ (light absorber—CdS/CdSe, Azevedo et al., 2016). Previous demonstrations of O 2 /H 2 O redox-based SRCs achieved modest potential savings, but TiO 2 (3.2–3.0 eV, J charge ∼0.01 mA/cm 2 ) (Kim et al., 2016a) and C 3 N 4 (2.7 eV, J charge ∼ 0.05 mA/cm 2 ) (Liu et al., 2016) cannot achieve such a high current density as we did with BiVO 4 (2.4 eV, J charge >1.0–3.0 mA/cm 2 ). Another important aspect of our BiVO 4 PE is transparency that other previous studies could not have (Li et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2016).…”