To investigate the effect of the surface structure of dye‐sensitized photocatalyst nanoparticles, we prepared three types of RuII‐photosensitizer (PS)‐double‐layered Pt‐cocatalyst‐loaded TiO2 nanoparticles with different surface structures, Zr‐RuCP6‐Zr‐RuP6@N wt %Pt‐TiO2, RuCP6‐Zr‐RuP6@N wt %Pt‐TiO2, and RuCP2‐Zr‐RuP6@N wt %Pt‐TiO2 (N=0.2, 1, and 5), and evaluated their photocatalytic H2 evolution activity in the presence of redox‐reversible iodide as the electron donor. Although the driving force of the electron injection from I− to the photo‐oxidized RuIII PS is comparable, the activity increased in the following order: RuCP2‐Zr‐RuP6@1 wt %Pt‐TiO2 < RuCP6‐Zr‐RuP6@1 wt %Pt‐TiO2 < Zr‐RuCP6‐Zr‐RuP6@1 wt %Pt‐TiO2. The apparent quantum yield of Zr‐RuCP6‐Zr‐RuP6@1 wt %Pt‐TiO2 in the first hour reached 1 %. Zeta‐potential measurements suggest that the surface Zr4+‐phosphate groups attracted I− anions to the nanoparticle–solution interface. Our results indicate that the surface modification of dye‐sensitized photocatalysts is a promising approach to enhance photocatalytic activity with various redox mediators.