2006
DOI: 10.1205/cherd05034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid Foam Packings for Multiphase Reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An air-water system was used to study the hydrodynamics and mass transfer in both co-current and counter-current operations in solid foam packings of 5-40 pores per linear inch (ppi). [31][32][33] For countercurrent operation, three flow regimes were identified, both bubble and pulsating flows for high liquid hold-up and trickle flow for low liquid hold-up. Furthermore, in the case of low liquid hold-up, the liquid side mass transfer coefficient increases with increasing ppi and liquid Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An air-water system was used to study the hydrodynamics and mass transfer in both co-current and counter-current operations in solid foam packings of 5-40 pores per linear inch (ppi). [31][32][33] For countercurrent operation, three flow regimes were identified, both bubble and pulsating flows for high liquid hold-up and trickle flow for low liquid hold-up. Furthermore, in the case of low liquid hold-up, the liquid side mass transfer coefficient increases with increasing ppi and liquid Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high surface area allows an increase in contact of the phases in liquidliquid or liquid-gas processes. [5][6] Development of new effective methods for the coating of the catalysts on the foams should facilitate the application of these foams in the catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge consolidation became visible in concise textbooks, such as of Brötz or, with higher emphasis on transport phenomena, of Bird, Stewart, and Lightfood in 1960 . Miniaturization of equipment is visible since 1950 for analytics and catalytic gas phase reactions and got new momentum in the 1990s with monolithic reactors and novel fabrication techniques . More complex equipment arrangement with integrated process steps and functions was possible with improved control strategies from concepts in process systems engineering starting in the 1970s with increasing computational power.…”
Section: Concise Historical Development Of Chemical Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 95%