2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid lipid templating of macroporous tissue engineering scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study performed by Shi et al 40 showed a scaffold with accessible porosity range at maximum 75% for a minimum pore connection size of 200 m. Hacker et al 41 reported up to 50% reduction of the interconnection with the same minimum pore connection size. Our scaffolds had an accessible of porosity maximum 98% for this minimum pore connection size.…”
Section: Scaffold Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A study performed by Shi et al 40 showed a scaffold with accessible porosity range at maximum 75% for a minimum pore connection size of 200 m. Hacker et al 41 reported up to 50% reduction of the interconnection with the same minimum pore connection size. Our scaffolds had an accessible of porosity maximum 98% for this minimum pore connection size.…”
Section: Scaffold Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A 3D shrinkwrap process was performed to shrink the outside boundary of the volume of interest (VOI) in a scaffold through any openings whose size was equal to or larger than 53 mm. Any void space connected via interconnects below this size was considered to be inaccessible, 34 based upon reported minimum pore interconnection sizes for bone tissue ingrowth. 35,36 Interconnectivity was calculated as follows 37 :…”
Section: Microcomputed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Orthopaedic applications also require scaffolds with adequate mechanical properties to withstand physiological loading and restore tissue function without causing deleterious stress-shielding effects. 2, 67, 910 Finally, the ability to match the irregular geometries of these types of bone defects is necessary to promote osseointegration and full healing. Injectable grafts that cure in situ are preferable in this aspect to more costly and time-consuming computer-aided design molds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%