2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(02)02057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid–liquid interface energies in the succinonitrile and succinonitrile–carbon tetrabromide eutectic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of ␥ is found to be about 20% lower than the experimental value obtained by Schaefer et al, 29 but within the error bars of the more recent experimental result of Maraşli et al 30 The interfacial free energy is found to be very nearly isotropic, in agreement with experiment. 9,10 In addition, the Turnbull coefficient for succinonitrile from our simulation ͑0.35± 0.02͒ is in agreement with the experiments within the error bars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of ␥ is found to be about 20% lower than the experimental value obtained by Schaefer et al, 29 but within the error bars of the more recent experimental result of Maraşli et al 30 The interfacial free energy is found to be very nearly isotropic, in agreement with experiment. 9,10 In addition, the Turnbull coefficient for succinonitrile from our simulation ͑0.35± 0.02͒ is in agreement with the experiments within the error bars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…͓͑8.9± 0.5͒ ϫ 10 −3 J m −2 ͔, but within the error bars of the more recent value of ͓͑7.9± 0.8͒ ϫ 10 −3 J m −2 ͔ of Maraşli et al 30 However, even given the large experimental uncertainty, it is reasonable to conclude that our value is at least 10% lower than the true experimental value. Our simulation indicates that the anisotropy in the interfacial free energy is very small.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They measured solid-solid and solid-liquid interface energies in the Al-CuAl 2 and Al-NiAl 3 eutectic systems and Al-Ti peritectic system. More recently, Bayender et al, [15,16] Maraşli et al, [17] Keşlioglu and Maraşli, [18] and Erol et al [19] have observed the equilibrated grain boundary groove shapes for transparent and opaque materials. They applied Gündüz and Hunt's numerical method to determine Gibbs-Thomson coefficients, solid-liquid interface energies, and grain boundary energies in camphene, pivalic acid, succinonitrile and succinonitrile-carbontetra bromide, Al-Zn, and Bi-Cd binary eutectic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The aim of the present work was to determine the GibbsThomson coefficient, solid-liquid interfacial energy, and grain boundary energy from observed grain boundary groove shapes. A radial heat flow apparatus originally designed by Gündüz and Hunt [10,11] was used to observe the equilibrated grain boundary groove shapes for Zn solid in equilibrium with the ZnMg eutectic liquid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%