2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid oxide fuel cell cathodes by infiltration of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ into Gd-Doped Ceria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

14
111
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
14
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to providing more TPB sites, the use of composites is also advantageous for mechanical stability, since it alleviates the problem of thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between the electrolyte and electronic conductor. [13][14][15] Alternative perovskites with mixed ionic and electronic conductivity (MIEC), such as LSF (La 1Àx Sr x FeO 3 ) or LSCF (La 1Àx Sr x Co 1-y Fe y O 3 ) have also been proposed as cathode materials for SOFCs, especially for operation at lower temperatures, 873-1073 K. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The ionic conductivity of LSF is significantly higher than that of LSM (8.3 Â 10 À4 S/cm at 973 K), 26 so that oxygen adsorption and reduction do not have to be spatially confined to the TPB sites. 3,15,27 However, the ionic conductivity of MIECs is still much lower than that of the YSZ (1.8 Â 10 À2 S/cm at 973 K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing more TPB sites, the use of composites is also advantageous for mechanical stability, since it alleviates the problem of thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between the electrolyte and electronic conductor. [13][14][15] Alternative perovskites with mixed ionic and electronic conductivity (MIEC), such as LSF (La 1Àx Sr x FeO 3 ) or LSCF (La 1Àx Sr x Co 1-y Fe y O 3 ) have also been proposed as cathode materials for SOFCs, especially for operation at lower temperatures, 873-1073 K. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The ionic conductivity of LSF is significantly higher than that of LSM (8.3 Â 10 À4 S/cm at 973 K), 26 so that oxygen adsorption and reduction do not have to be spatially confined to the TPB sites. 3,15,27 However, the ionic conductivity of MIECs is still much lower than that of the YSZ (1.8 Â 10 À2 S/cm at 973 K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collision frequency of LSCFLSCF particles decreased from unity at 0 mass % GDC to 0.115 at 10 mass % GDC; i.e., the conduction paths between LSCF particles was blocked by GDC particles, resulting in the increased resistance. Shah et al 3) also reported that the charge transfer resistance in GDCLCSF cathodes gradually decreases as the amount of LSCF infiltrated into the GDC scaffold increases (from 0.76 to 12.5 vol %). The conductivity of the composite cathode is more sensitive to the infiltration process than to the dry process.…”
Section: ¹mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A cathode composed of a mixture of GDC and LSCF is expected to exhibit enhanced electrocatalytic activity for the reaction of O 2 and electrons. Shah et al 3) measured the performance of a cathode fabricated by impregnating a porous GDC scaffold with a mixed nitrate solution of LSCF precursor. The formed nanometer-scale (50 nm) LSCF network reduced the charge transfer resistance at an operating temperature of 650°C over 300 h. Liu et al 4) prepared an LSCFGDC composite cathode by impregnating the porous GDC scaffold with a mixed nitrate solution of La, Sr, Co, and Fe and measured the degradation in the composite cathode performance at 750°C in air over 500 h. The GDC scaffold method was effective in expanding the triple-phase boundary (GDC electrolyteLSCF cathodeO 2 gas).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible strategy is to mix LSCF with the electrolyte gadolinia-doped ceria (GDC). It is reported that after infiltration with ionic conductive GDC, the microstructure stability, the ionic conductivity, the oxygen reduction activity as well as the adhesion to electrolyte of LSCF cathode could be improved [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. For instance, the polarization resistance of La0.8Sr0.2Co0.5Fe0.5O3−δ-GDC composite decreased to 1.6 Ω cm 2 at 650 °C [31], and that of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ-GDC, fabricated by impregnation, reached values as low as 0.24 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the polarization resistance of La0.8Sr0.2Co0.5Fe0.5O3−δ-GDC composite decreased to 1.6 Ω cm 2 at 650 °C [31], and that of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ-GDC, fabricated by impregnation, reached values as low as 0.24 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C. Such improvement was mostly due to the formation of nano-scale (~50 nm) LSCF networks [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%