Conspectus
Amorphous
nanomaterials, with unique structural features such as
long-range atomic disorder and nanoscale particle or grain sizes,
possess some advantageous properties for a number of materials applications.
For example, amorphous vanadium oxide exhibits a record-high cycling
stability for supercapacitors. Several synthetic strategies have been
developed to produce amorphous nanomaterials, such as physical processing-based
approaches including cutting, deposition, and spinning, as well as
chemical syntheses by solution or solid state reactions. However,
despite the rapid development of amorphous nanomaterials, their morphology
is still irregular or primarily sphere-like. The limited morphology
control is partially attributed to the lack of preferred growth direction
for the amorphous materials. It will be interesting to know whether
different morphologies of even amorphous nanomaterials can influence
their properties as much as their crystalline counterparts.
Wet chemical synthesis, which can usually be carried out under
relatively facile reaction conditions, has achieved remarkable success
for creating crystalline nanomaterials with well-defined shapes, such
as one-dimensional (1D) nanowires, two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets,
and three-dimensional (3D) complex structures. However, there are
two main obstacles for shape control of amorphous nanomaterials using
wet chemical strategies. First, it is difficult to form a stable amorphous
state under wet chemical conditions. The amorphous state is metastable
in solution according to classic nucleation theory, which is prone
to phase transformation to form crystalline state. Second, common
morphology control mechanisms for nanocrystals are ultimately relying
on the intrinsic directionality of the lattices, which unfortunately
is not relevant to the isotropic amorphous nanomaterials.
In
this Account, we describe how shape control of 1D, 2D, and 3D
amorphous nanomaterials can be achieved in wet chemical synthesis
to create well-defined morphologies, which are based on two main strategies:
Blocking agents that can stabilize the amorphous state in solution,
and morphology-tunable parameters that can induce directional growth.
Discussion on the phase transfer blocking mechanisms includes lattice
disordering, controlled hydrolysis, rapid reaction, and ionic exchange,
and for morphology control through confinement it includes precursor
transformation, templated reactions, interfacial etching, and spatial
confinement.
In addition, we present examples showing how these
well-defined
morphology leads to desirable properties in applications of mechanics,
energy storage, catalysis, and optics, highlighting their structural-properties
relationship. Finally, some perspectives are discussed regarding future
research opportunities in the area of amorphous nanomaterials.