2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.b34109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid Propellant Microthruster Design for Nanosatellite Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the above studies, Lewis et al [26] in 2000, You et al [52] in 2005, Rossi et al [53] in 2005, Sathiyanathan et al [54] in 2011, and Shen et al [55] in 2014 also developed different SPM arrays. The vertical design has advantages of high integration level and convenient expansion.…”
Section: Summary Of Spm and Spm Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the above studies, Lewis et al [26] in 2000, You et al [52] in 2005, Rossi et al [53] in 2005, Sathiyanathan et al [54] in 2011, and Shen et al [55] in 2014 also developed different SPM arrays. The vertical design has advantages of high integration level and convenient expansion.…”
Section: Summary Of Spm and Spm Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complex structure and operation of microthrusters with liquid propellants [43,44], the solid propellants are preferred, which have advantages such as simplicity, adequate functionality, safety, etc. The impulse control should be in mNs resolution [45]. The burning time of propellant in micro chamber is a few milliseconds, as the charge mass is in order of micrograms to milligrams.…”
Section: Nano-energetic Micropropulsion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsolid propellant thrusters (MSPT) consisting of micronozzles and microigniters have great potential applications in the small space vehicles due to their advantages, such as having no movable components and no liquid leakage [1–6]. Especially, the MSPT array including multiple thruster units has become more favourable since it can satisfy the flexible thrust configuration requirements [7–11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%