2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with massive central calcification in an old man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a few cases of extensively calcified pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm have been recently reported in the literature (7,8); the imaging findings presented in these reports were very similar in appearance to those shown in our cases. Due to the similarity of these radiological findings, we suggest that GIST should therefore be included in the differential diagnosis of calcified intraabdominal masses located near the stomach or pancreas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Interestingly, a few cases of extensively calcified pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm have been recently reported in the literature (7,8); the imaging findings presented in these reports were very similar in appearance to those shown in our cases. Due to the similarity of these radiological findings, we suggest that GIST should therefore be included in the differential diagnosis of calcified intraabdominal masses located near the stomach or pancreas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Mutations of CTNBB1 in SPN were first demonstrated in 2001 (7). We reviewed and analyzed the mutations of CTNBB1 in 123 pancreatic SPN cases that retrieved from PubMed search encompassing the years 2001 through 2012 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Of these 123 cases, 111 (90.2%) of the patients with pancreatic SPN demonstrated mutations in CTNNB1 exon 3 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study of SPTs by Machado et al, 6 in which there were seven male patients, the mean age was higher among male patients (37 years vs 25 years). Matsuda et al 13 reported a case of SPT of the pancreas in a 76-year-old male and Tanino et al 14 reported a case of a 58-year-old male with SPT. However, Takahashi et al 7 reported that the mean age of the seven male patients with SPT in their group was 45.0 years and that of the seven female patients in the group was 45.5 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%