Global Raciality 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429402203-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solidarity Protests on US Security Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many analysts and activists suggest that systems of dominance, including white supremacy, also harm their supposed beneficiaries (see: McGhee, 2021), scholars often distinguish between two kinds of activists who partake in social change struggles. Directly aggrieved communities who contest an injustice that directly impacts them might be termed “core activists” (Kraemer, 2007) or “movement beneficiaries” (Myers, 2008), while activists who align themselves with the aggrieved but are not themselves the direct targets of the oppression they contest have been termed “conscience constituents” (McCarthy & Zald, 1977), “allies” (Myers, 2008), “privileged outsiders” (Munkres, 2008) and “solidarity activists” (Russo, 2018; Sundberg, 2008). Examples of such movement participants might include caste Hindus allied with Untouchables in the Indian independence movement (Marx & Useem, 1971), US citizens in the Central American Solidarity movement (Nepstad, 2004; Smith, 1996) and men in feminist movements (Messner, et al., 2015; Schacht & Ewing, 2001).…”
Section: Solidarity Activistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While many analysts and activists suggest that systems of dominance, including white supremacy, also harm their supposed beneficiaries (see: McGhee, 2021), scholars often distinguish between two kinds of activists who partake in social change struggles. Directly aggrieved communities who contest an injustice that directly impacts them might be termed “core activists” (Kraemer, 2007) or “movement beneficiaries” (Myers, 2008), while activists who align themselves with the aggrieved but are not themselves the direct targets of the oppression they contest have been termed “conscience constituents” (McCarthy & Zald, 1977), “allies” (Myers, 2008), “privileged outsiders” (Munkres, 2008) and “solidarity activists” (Russo, 2018; Sundberg, 2008). Examples of such movement participants might include caste Hindus allied with Untouchables in the Indian independence movement (Marx & Useem, 1971), US citizens in the Central American Solidarity movement (Nepstad, 2004; Smith, 1996) and men in feminist movements (Messner, et al., 2015; Schacht & Ewing, 2001).…”
Section: Solidarity Activistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solidarity activists are not necessarily similarly positioned to each other, given that their sole unifying feature is that they enjoy at least one privilege or protection that a movements' beneficiaries do not (Russo, 2018). As a parallel insight, scholars have well established that white people are not a monolith, with the experiences and meanings of whiteness shaped by a multitude of other factors and intersectional identities (Hartigan, 1998; McDermott, 2020).…”
Section: Solidarity Activistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations