“…While many analysts and activists suggest that systems of dominance, including white supremacy, also harm their supposed beneficiaries (see: McGhee, 2021), scholars often distinguish between two kinds of activists who partake in social change struggles. Directly aggrieved communities who contest an injustice that directly impacts them might be termed “core activists” (Kraemer, 2007) or “movement beneficiaries” (Myers, 2008), while activists who align themselves with the aggrieved but are not themselves the direct targets of the oppression they contest have been termed “conscience constituents” (McCarthy & Zald, 1977), “allies” (Myers, 2008), “privileged outsiders” (Munkres, 2008) and “solidarity activists” (Russo, 2018; Sundberg, 2008). Examples of such movement participants might include caste Hindus allied with Untouchables in the Indian independence movement (Marx & Useem, 1971), US citizens in the Central American Solidarity movement (Nepstad, 2004; Smith, 1996) and men in feminist movements (Messner, et al., 2015; Schacht & Ewing, 2001).…”