1980
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600690617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility of polar organic solutes in nonaqueous systems: Role of specific interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the partition coefficient measurements were carried out at very low concentrations (less than 10 −3 moles/liter) to prevent the possible participation of self‐association, the goodness of fit of Eq. (4) to the data provides additional evidence for the absence of such an effect 22–26. Moreover, as shown in Figure 4, no difference was seen in the tyramine partition coefficients at two different aqueous concentrations of 1 and 0.05 mM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the partition coefficient measurements were carried out at very low concentrations (less than 10 −3 moles/liter) to prevent the possible participation of self‐association, the goodness of fit of Eq. (4) to the data provides additional evidence for the absence of such an effect 22–26. Moreover, as shown in Figure 4, no difference was seen in the tyramine partition coefficients at two different aqueous concentrations of 1 and 0.05 mM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The concentration in each phase was then determined using a reversed phase HPLC method described previously 21. The operating concentration of 1 mM or lower was chosen for all the solutes to avoid possible contributions of self‐associated species22–26 to the measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When plotted on a log-linear plot, near-linear relationships were obtained for all pressures, indicating an approximate exponential relationship between solubility and cosolvent concentration as shown in Figure 4. This is in contrast to liquid systems containing 1:l interactions (Anderson et al, 1980;Fung and Higuchi, 1971) where the solubility is a linear function of cosolvent concentration. This behavior may indicate that the greater free volume in a supercritical fluid compared to a liquid appears to allow cosolvent-solute interactions to alter the local composition to a greater extent and thus be manifested in a stronger dependency of solubility on cosolvent concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Efforts to facilitate computational prediction of this property are therefore warranted and are expected to increase the throughput and lower the costs of lipid formulation development (2). As described by Anderson et al (17), ideal solubility theory and regular solution theory fail to give an accurate prediction of drug solubility in polar organic lipid solutes and solvents, due to the absence of molecular interactions in the calculations. Similarly, Thi et al (16) examined the solubility of ten compounds in ten LBF excipients, but were unable to find a clear link between the physicochemical properties of the drugs investigated and solubility in the excipients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%