2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble inhibitors/deactivators of cellulase enzymes from lignocellulosic biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
286
4
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
286
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of improved enzymatic hydrolysis on the economics of the organosolv process was studied by setting sugar conversion yield 6 percentage points higher for all carbohydrates. On the other hand, due to enzyme inhibition and deactivation caused by soluble sugars, furfural, hydroxymethyl furfural, organic acids, and phenolics at higher solids contents (see Kim et al 2011), the conversion rates in industrial scale enzymatic hydrolysis could be significantly lower than those reported by Pan et al (2006). Therefore, a conversion of both cellulose and hemicelluloses to sugars of 80% was adopted as a more conservative scenario for the enzymatic hydrolysis.…”
Section: Technical Parameters Varied In Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of improved enzymatic hydrolysis on the economics of the organosolv process was studied by setting sugar conversion yield 6 percentage points higher for all carbohydrates. On the other hand, due to enzyme inhibition and deactivation caused by soluble sugars, furfural, hydroxymethyl furfural, organic acids, and phenolics at higher solids contents (see Kim et al 2011), the conversion rates in industrial scale enzymatic hydrolysis could be significantly lower than those reported by Pan et al (2006). Therefore, a conversion of both cellulose and hemicelluloses to sugars of 80% was adopted as a more conservative scenario for the enzymatic hydrolysis.…”
Section: Technical Parameters Varied In Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenol concentrations depend on the biomass type, the pretreatment conditions and the biomass to water ratio. Although the level of inhibition is highly dependent on the type and concentration of phenol, these compounds are potent cellulase inhibitors even at low concentrations [10,[19][20][21]. Concentrations of phenolic compounds of 1.3 g/L were reported to strongly inhibit cellulases during the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulosic substrate [21].…”
Section: Steam Explosion Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the level of inhibition is highly dependent on the type and concentration of phenol, these compounds are potent cellulase inhibitors even at low concentrations [10,[19][20][21]. Concentrations of phenolic compounds of 1.3 g/L were reported to strongly inhibit cellulases during the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulosic substrate [21]. Similarly, García-Aparicio et al [22] found 50% cellulase inhibition in presence of prehydrolysate from steamexploded barley straw with 4.9 g/L total phenols.…”
Section: Steam Explosion Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7243 reaction conditions, and substrate pore surface area or substrate accessibility to cellulose (Lan et al 2013). It is also affected by the degraded products of hemicellulose and lignin (Mussatto et al 2008;Kim et al 2011). Irreversible loss of cellulases is observed with the non-specific binding of lignin, which subsequently reduces the efficiency of hydrolysis (Gao et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%