1995
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0195-46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solute Focusing Techniques for Bioseparations

Abstract: The growth of industrial biotechnology has had a major impact on the research and development of both analytical and preparative focusing techniques. Pioneering methods such as isoelectric focusing are being modified to overcome the limitations of batch mode operation, scale up difficulties, high power requirement, and excessive heat generation. present advances in focusing techniques have been made by either overcoming the limitations of standard techniques or by investigating new focusing systems. Here we re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While label-based methods benefit from the high specificity with which markers can be applied and detected, separating cells based upon intrinsic properties, where applicable, circumvents the time and cost associated with the design of new assays. Combining intrinsic separation with equilibrium gradient methods, where a force field applied in a spatially nonuniform medium focuses particles to equilibrium positions, has revolutionized molecular separation over the past half century; however, the relatively small niche in the context of cell sorting occupied by these methods reflects in part their limited variety (e.g., DGC, FFF) for effecting cell separation. , The utility of intrinsic equilibrium separations is directly related to the number of biophysical properties to which they can be applied. To extend their applicability to cell biology, we propose a new microfluidic equilibrium separation method, called isodielectric separation (IDS), that combines dielectrophoresis (DEP) with spatial gradients in electrical conductivity to sort electrically distinguishable cells and particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While label-based methods benefit from the high specificity with which markers can be applied and detected, separating cells based upon intrinsic properties, where applicable, circumvents the time and cost associated with the design of new assays. Combining intrinsic separation with equilibrium gradient methods, where a force field applied in a spatially nonuniform medium focuses particles to equilibrium positions, has revolutionized molecular separation over the past half century; however, the relatively small niche in the context of cell sorting occupied by these methods reflects in part their limited variety (e.g., DGC, FFF) for effecting cell separation. , The utility of intrinsic equilibrium separations is directly related to the number of biophysical properties to which they can be applied. To extend their applicability to cell biology, we propose a new microfluidic equilibrium separation method, called isodielectric separation (IDS), that combines dielectrophoresis (DEP) with spatial gradients in electrical conductivity to sort electrically distinguishable cells and particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attractors are called focusing points in a few separation techniques : isoelectric focusing, field gradient focusing, chromatographic focusing and others (see, for example, Evans & Burns 1995 ;Wang et al 2002). A technique called parametric pumping using two coherently oscillating fields (for example, an oscillating flow and oscillating temperature) was applied to separate particles without considering focusing points and repellers (Wilhelm et al 1968).…”
Section: Separation and Concentration Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is a fractionation technique that segregates amphoteric particles on the basis of isoelectric point and is commonly used for high-resolution analysis of biological samples, particularly for peptide and protein analysis. , In part because standard methods of IEF require high power and costly ampholyte solutions, the use of IEF for preparative applications is expensive compared to other options and therefore less commonly used . The microfluidic IEF device described in this report (see Figure ) addresses these concerns by generating a pH gradient between two closely spaced electrodes in a “natural” buffer system that requires low power and no synthetic ampholytes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%