2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of general integral equations of micromechanics of heterogeneous materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were S denotes the unit sphere and d m denotes a differential solid angle on S in the direction of any unit vector m. Equation ( 18) was proved in [21] for the 3D case whereas the case d = 2 can be justified in a similar manner. Equation ( 18) at d = 1 can also be reduced to (17) by the variable exchange x − z → r, x + y → s. Indeed, the origin-centered unit 1D "sphere" is the set {−1, 1}, which has a measure of 2. Then the integrand of ( 18) is reduced to the integrand of ( 17) by the use of the equality (7).…”
Section: C(xx)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…were S denotes the unit sphere and d m denotes a differential solid angle on S in the direction of any unit vector m. Equation ( 18) was proved in [21] for the 3D case whereas the case d = 2 can be justified in a similar manner. Equation ( 18) at d = 1 can also be reduced to (17) by the variable exchange x − z → r, x + y → s. Indeed, the origin-centered unit 1D "sphere" is the set {−1, 1}, which has a measure of 2. Then the integrand of ( 18) is reduced to the integrand of ( 17) by the use of the equality (7).…”
Section: C(xx)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximative character of the variational bounds and their restricted opportunities (for the formula manipulations) of the variational methods in comparison with the different self-consistent methods is explained by a fundamental reason. Indeed, the self-consistent methods in linear statics of mechanics of CMs were exploited in a wide class of micromechanical problems for CMs with non-ellipsoidal, coated, and continuously inhomogeneous heterogeneities with possible non-ideal interface as well as for different non-local problems (inhomogeneous remote loading, functionally graded materials, clustered materials, bounded media, nanocomposites, non-local constitutive law, e.g., peridynamics; see, e.g., [16,17] for references). Analyses of so much diverse (in the sense of microtopology and constitutive laws) problems are essentially simplified due to linear dependence of the effective properties on average fields (strains and stresses) inside the inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the residual local fields were presented in terms of certain transformation influence functions with the establishment of their relation to the analogous mechanical influence functions (50) and (51) for the special case of piecewise uniform eigenfields. As an analogy between the aforementioned theories and their peristatic version, we will assume that the nonlocal operatorL is presented in the form (6) and (72), and for the phase…”
Section: Transformation Influence Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, integral equations have been encountered in variety applied sciences, such as mathematics, engineering, thermodynamic, molecular properties, electromagnetics, Stokes flow, heat and mass transfer, and micromechanics [1][2][3][4][5][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Most of the time, integral equations and their different types are too hard to be solved analytically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%