Literature estimates of metal-protein affinities are widely scattered for many systems, as highlighted by the class of metallo-chaperone proteins, which includes human Atox1. The discrepancies may be attributed to unreliable detection probes and/or inconsistent affinity standards. The human metallo-chaperone protein Atox1 (known also as Hah1) delivers Cu I to the trans-Golgi network (1, 2). Atx1, the version from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was the first copper metallo-chaperone to be identified (3). They both feature the classic ferredoxin ␣␣-fold with a CXXC motif acting as a high affinity Cu I -binding site ( Fig. 1) (4, 5). Homologues are found in cyanobacteria (Atx1), in Enterococcus hirae (CopZ), in Bacillus subtilis (CopZ), and in many other organisms (6).The human P 1B -type ATPase ATP7A accepts copper from Atox1 and transports it into the lumen of the trans-Golgi network (2). ATP7B performs a related role in liver cells. The inherited disorders Menkes and Wilson diseases are associated with defects in ATP7A and ATP7B, respectively (7). Equivalent metal transporters exist in other organisms such as Ccc2 from S. cerevisiae (3) and heavy metal ATPases 5-8 (HMA5-8) in the simple plant Arabidopsis thaliana (8). Their N termini contain between one and six metal-binding domains (MBDs) 2 that may interact with and receive Cu I directly from Atox1-type metallo-chaperones (6). It appears that, for some Cu I -ATPases at least, metal-binding sites in the transmembrane domain may also independently receive Cu I from copper chaperones (9). The overall molecular structure and binding site of each MBD is similar to that of Atox1 (10).Accurate estimation of affinities for Cu I (as expressed by the dissociation constant K D ) is essential for a quantitative understanding of reactivity and mechanisms of action. Yet reported K D values are scattered widely as highlighted by those of Atox1-type proteins, which differ by more than 10 orders of magnitude (K D ϳ10 Ϫ5 , 10 Ϫ10 , 10 Ϫ14 , and 10 Ϫ18 M) even though the structures and metal-binding sites of these proteins essentially superimpose (11-16). The various values were determined via different experimental approaches with different ligand probes and affinity standards. The affinities of some of the probes and standards remain in dispute. In addition, the intrinsic instability of free Cu ϩ in aqueous solution and the tendency to aerial oxidation of cysteine ligands impose special conditions on these experiments. These aspects are complicated further by reports that thiol ligands such as endogenous glutathione (GSH) may expand the Cu I coordination sphere in these proteins or lead to polymeric forms (14,17,18).In an attempt to resolve these fundamental issues for this iconic set of proteins, this study surveys the literature values for the Cu I affinities of the four probe ligands bicinchoninate (Bca), bathocuproine disulfonate (Bcs), dithiothreitol (Dtt), and glutathione (GSH) (Scheme 1). By direct experimental comparison, their relative affinities are unifi...