“…We also observe that more recently, in the case 1 although the technology of the Kato problem continues to play a crucial role in the present paper and in [HKMP]. p = 2, the fact that (D 2 ) (with square function estimates) ⇐⇒ (R) 2 (again, up to adjoints), was established explicitly in [AR] (when the domain is the ball, but the proof there carries over to the half-space mutatis mutandi), and is at least implicit in the combination of results in [AAMc,Section 4] and [AAAHK,Estimate (5.3)], and also in [AA,Section 9]. Our main result, Theorem 1.11, generalizes all implications above, at least as far as the t-independent matrices are concerned, under the assumption of De Giorgi-Nash-Moser bounds for solutions.…”