2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5144912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvation at metal/water interfaces: An ab initio molecular dynamics benchmark of common computational approaches

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
174
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
174
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, continuum solvation models such as Vaspsol (Mathew et al, 2014(Mathew et al, , 2019, COSMO (Klamt and Schüürmann, 1993), or Jaguar (Bochevarov et al, 2013) are commonly used to describe solvation at the electrode/electrolyte interface (Abidi et al, 2020;Basdogan et al, 2020b;Groß, 2020). However at least in the case of the intermediates relevant to the ORR and CO 2 reduction reactions on Cu, Au, and Pt, the widely used continuum solvation models did not improve the accuracy of binding energies compared to the respective calculations in vacuum (Heenen et al, 2020). Due to the complexity and computational costs of AIMD, solvation models by the inclusion of machine-learning techniques have been developed (Basdogan et al, 2020b), which are a promising alternative to continuum solvation models.…”
Section: Influence Of the Electrolyte: Beyond The Che Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, continuum solvation models such as Vaspsol (Mathew et al, 2014(Mathew et al, , 2019, COSMO (Klamt and Schüürmann, 1993), or Jaguar (Bochevarov et al, 2013) are commonly used to describe solvation at the electrode/electrolyte interface (Abidi et al, 2020;Basdogan et al, 2020b;Groß, 2020). However at least in the case of the intermediates relevant to the ORR and CO 2 reduction reactions on Cu, Au, and Pt, the widely used continuum solvation models did not improve the accuracy of binding energies compared to the respective calculations in vacuum (Heenen et al, 2020). Due to the complexity and computational costs of AIMD, solvation models by the inclusion of machine-learning techniques have been developed (Basdogan et al, 2020b), which are a promising alternative to continuum solvation models.…”
Section: Influence Of the Electrolyte: Beyond The Che Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner we were able to construct (bi)sulfate adsorbate configurations with coverages between 0.05 and 0.33. To consider solvent effects we used an implicit solvation model (Petrosyan et al, 2005(Petrosyan et al, , 2007Letchworth-Weaver and Arias, 2012;Gunceler et al, 2013;Sakong et al, 2015;Bramley et al, 2020;Heenen et al, 2020) as implemented in the VASP code (Mathew et al, 2014). For the permittivity of the solvent we used the one of clean water (80 As Vm ).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvation effects are of crucial importance to the theoretical description of electrocatalytic processes. [94][95][96] Commonly, the effect of the surrounding electrolyte solution on the stabilization of adsorbates is completely neglected, described by computationally inexpensive continuum solvent models, or is assumed to be constant when screening electrodes in a homologous series of materials. All these procedures are incomplete, considering that solvation energies of adsorbates are not transferable between different surfaces and catalysts.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these procedures are incomplete, considering that solvation energies of adsorbates are not transferable between different surfaces and catalysts. [96] Ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations allow proper assessment of solvation energies, but this approach is very costly. Therefore, the inclusion of ab initio MD techniques for an improved assessment of solvent contributions to the stabilization of reaction intermediates, for example, the OH, O, and OOH adsorbates within oxygen electrocatalysis, may consist of a two-step scheme.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%