2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving haplotyping inference parsimony problem using a new basic polynomial formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the number of distinct haplotypes, Brown and Harrower (2004) proposed constructing haplotype vectors by associating a variable to each site; they subsequently used constraints to establish the exact haplotype structures. On the other hand, Bertolazzi et al (2008) first formulated PPH as a minimization problem characterized by a polynomial number of variables and constraints. Then the authors turned the problem into a maximization problem and strengthened the model by using clique inequalities, symmetry breaking, inequalities, and dominance relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To minimize the number of distinct haplotypes, Brown and Harrower (2004) proposed constructing haplotype vectors by associating a variable to each site; they subsequently used constraints to establish the exact haplotype structures. On the other hand, Bertolazzi et al (2008) first formulated PPH as a minimization problem characterized by a polynomial number of variables and constraints. Then the authors turned the problem into a maximization problem and strengthened the model by using clique inequalities, symmetry breaking, inequalities, and dominance relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author described a model, exponential in size, characterized by two kinds of variables-one for haplotypes and the other for haplotype pairs-and by the exhaustive generation of the set of all haplotypes compatible with some genotype in the input. Similar integer programming models were also used by Brown and Harrower (2004) and Bertolazzi et al (2008). To minimize the number of distinct haplotypes, Brown and Harrower (2004) proposed constructing haplotype vectors by associating a variable to each site; they subsequently used constraints to establish the exact haplotype structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a sequence has the same allele on a site as the two (unknown) haplotype sequences if they agree on that site and otherwise is regarded as ambiguous. Combined with the fact that the determination of haplotype sequences via experiments is usually highly costly and time consuming [3], [4] it is therefore not surprising that the problem of inferring for a set of genotype sequences a set of, in a welldefined sense, explaining haplotype sequences has received a considerable amount of attention in the literature. For example, cast as a statistical problem it has led to powerful approaches such as PHASE [5] which have turned out to be particularly useful in case the amount of variability in a set of genotype sequences is high (see [6], [7] for more on this and [8] for a recent overview on statistical approaches).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative greedy heuristic, called Collaps, was proposed by Bertolazzi et al (2008). The idea at its core is based on the fact that any solution of PPH may be represented by means of a matrix H having at most 2m distinct rows and p columns.…”
Section: Approximation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, constraints (36)- (39) impose the sum operator between haplotypes. Bertolazzi et al (2008) set the initial value of UB by means of a heuristic called Collaps (see Section 5.2). However, the authors observed that PPH can be solved by replacing Formulation 5 by a sequence of maximization problems.…”
Section: Polynomial and Hybrid Ilp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%