2019
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2018.2883599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Incremental Optimization Problems via Cooperative Coevolution

Abstract: Engineering designs can involve multiple stages, where at each stage, the design models are incrementally modified and optimized. In contrast to traditional dynamic optimization problems where the changes are caused by some objective factors, the changes in such incremental optimization problems are usually caused by the modifications made by the decision makers during the design process. While existing work in the literature is mainly focused on traditional dynamic optimization, little research has been dedic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two populations are adapted accordingly and, after changing the number of objectives, they are reconstructed following mechanisms that consider dimensionality changes. The second type concerns the increase of the number of decision variables [41] that were addressed to single-objective problems.…”
Section: Dynamic Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two populations are adapted accordingly and, after changing the number of objectives, they are reconstructed following mechanisms that consider dimensionality changes. The second type concerns the increase of the number of decision variables [41] that were addressed to single-objective problems.…”
Section: Dynamic Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a method discards matching information in previous environments and is not suitable for slightly changing environments. Another method is to optimize the new coming customer requests independently once a change occurs, based on the incremental (INC) optimization method [54], which can reduce response time but may easily fall into local optima. In the customer-EV dispatch service, the environment often changes slightly due to short optimization time.…”
Section: E Strategies Reacting To Dynamic Change Based On Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare MACO with the FCFS approach and five dynamic optimization algorithms, including restart ACS (RSACS), incremental (INC) method-based [54] ACS (INCACS), ACS-DVRP [52], P-ACO [50], and EIACO [53].…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of subjective fitness and complicated dynamics of cooperative coevolution systems are the main reasons for the failure of these systems [282]. Moreover, these systems do not allow mating between the individuals of heterogeneous subpopulations [283,284,285]. In contrast, the novel lateralized system will have an elementary architecture where solutions will be generated by utilizing homogeneous as well as heterogeneous BBKs.…”
Section: Cooperative Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%