2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic cells of goat and sheep milk: Analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
140
0
44

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
21
140
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…Somatic cell count in the second and the third lactation was 1.11x10 3 and 1.36x10 3 whereas in the fourth and later lactations it was the highest with average value of 1.42x10 3 . Similar values in regard to somatic cell count in goat milk, depending on the order of lactation, were reported by Raynal-Ljutovac et al (2006). Kozačinski et al (2002) established in goat milk average SCC of 1.300.000/ml and concluded that the limit for SCC in goat milk can be over 1.000.000/ml, which is in accordance with results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Somatic cell count in the second and the third lactation was 1.11x10 3 and 1.36x10 3 whereas in the fourth and later lactations it was the highest with average value of 1.42x10 3 . Similar values in regard to somatic cell count in goat milk, depending on the order of lactation, were reported by Raynal-Ljutovac et al (2006). Kozačinski et al (2002) established in goat milk average SCC of 1.300.000/ml and concluded that the limit for SCC in goat milk can be over 1.000.000/ml, which is in accordance with results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results demonstrate that all isolates presented antimicrobial activity against both Grampositive and Gram-negative bacteria, and against spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Previously, antimicrobial activity against microorganisms involved in mastitis and other diseases of sheep flock was also reported (7,26,35). As shown in Table 1 On the other hand, antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis was not observed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Gajdůšek et al (1996) zaznamenali (individuální vzorky mléka plemene koz Bílá krátkosrstá v průběhu první laktace), té-měř v souladu s našimi výsledky, korelaci mezi PSB a L −0,31 (P < 0,01). Raynal-Ljutovac et al (2007) …”
Section: Iii) Kozí Mléko -Vztah Počtu Somatických Buněk a Laktózyunclassified