2020
DOI: 10.37427/botcro-2020-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic embryogenesis as a tool for virus elimination in Croatian indigenous grapevine cultivars

Abstract: Most Croatian indigenous grapevine cultivars and vineyards are infected with a few dominant viruses. The goal of this study was to establish somatic embryogenesis as an efficient method for virus elimination from valuable Croatian cultivars and creating a reliable source of healthy plants. Somatic embryogenesis was induced from immature anthers and somatic embryogenesis-derived plantlets for seven indigenous cultivars were successfully regenerated. This procedure led to the elimination of viruses GFLV, GLRaV-1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, virus elimination success ranged from 13.3% to 62.5% depending on garlic ecotype, virus infection and embryogenesis treatment. This success of virus elimination by somatic embryogenesis is lower than the values obtained by Quainoo et al [23] for cocoa trees or Damba et al for cassava [24], but is comparable to the success rate of grapevine virus elimination as reported by Malenica et al [22]. The obtained success rate is also comparable to the results of other methods of garlic virus elimination [11,13,58].…”
Section: Virus Detection and Efficiency Of Virus Eliminationsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, virus elimination success ranged from 13.3% to 62.5% depending on garlic ecotype, virus infection and embryogenesis treatment. This success of virus elimination by somatic embryogenesis is lower than the values obtained by Quainoo et al [23] for cocoa trees or Damba et al for cassava [24], but is comparable to the success rate of grapevine virus elimination as reported by Malenica et al [22]. The obtained success rate is also comparable to the results of other methods of garlic virus elimination [11,13,58].…”
Section: Virus Detection and Efficiency Of Virus Eliminationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Instead of shoot meristem culture, Haque et al [19] used root tip culture followed by the separation of regenerated tiny shoots from the mother explant (two-step process) for virus elimination from garlic. Somatic embryogenesis alone or combined with thermotherapy [20][21][22] was effective in eliminating grapevine viruses. Somatic embryogenesis has also been successfully used for virus elimination in species such as cacao [23], cassava [24], and sugarcane [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first results for SE based elimination of viruses from grapevine were published by Goussard and coworkers [ 14 ], where grapevine leafroll associated viruses (GLRaV-2 and -3) were eliminated from ‘Roobernet’ cultivar. Using this method, several other viruses and even viroids were successfully eliminated from different cultivars [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. SE protocols vary according to the tissue explant, growth regulator type and concentration, and the direct or indirect somatic embryogenesis strategy (see Table S1 for details and references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding confirmed previous works conducted using other genotypes, in which diagnostic systems less effective than HTS and RT‐qPCR were adopted. In particular, GLRaV‐2 (Goussard et al ., 1991 ), GLRaV‐3 (Goussard et al ., 1991 ; Gambino et al ., 2006 ; Bouamama‐Gzara et al ., 2017 ; San Pedro et al ., 2017 ; Malenica et al ., 2020 ), GRSPaV (Gambino et al ., 2006 ; Bouamama‐Gzara et al ., 2017 ; Turcsan et al ., 2020 ), GFLV (Gambino et al ., 2009 ; San Pedro et al ., 2017 ; Malenica et al ., 2020 ), GFkV (San Pedro et al ., 2017 ; Malenica et al ., 2020 ; Turcsan et al ., 2020 ), GVA (Gambino et al ., 2006 ; Bouamama‐Gzara et al ., 2017 ) and GVT (Turcsan et al ., 2020 ) were efficiently removed from SC. In addition, in the case of GLRaV‐4 and GVD, our results represent the first report of sanitation obtained by SC in grapevine (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%