1989
DOI: 10.1051/jphys:0198900500180245500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of cross-slip mechanisms in metals and alloys

Abstract: Résumé. 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in the activation volume with stress suggests that a stress-assisted thermally activated mechanism like cross slip is the dominant deformation process at the test conditions. The true activation volume values in the range of 70-190 b 3 are in fairly good agreement with a cross-slip process [16,33].…”
Section: Cross Slip As the Rate Controlling Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease in the activation volume with stress suggests that a stress-assisted thermally activated mechanism like cross slip is the dominant deformation process at the test conditions. The true activation volume values in the range of 70-190 b 3 are in fairly good agreement with a cross-slip process [16,33].…”
Section: Cross Slip As the Rate Controlling Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Cross slip has been proposed as the rate controlling mechanism in several FCC [32,33] and HCP metals such as magnesium and zinc [20,34]. Very few studies, however, treated the cross slip of screw dislocations as a viable mechanism for deformation in zirconium in high temperature quasi-static tensile testing [35,36].…”
Section: Cross Slip As the Rate Controlling Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process of partial dissociation may be the result of the dislocation core modification, which is known as the formation of constrictions. Caillard and Martin believed that these constrictions caused the local expansion of the dislocation core on the adjacent glide planes, corresponding to the formation of an intrinsic stacking fault I 1 that is enclosed between two partial dislocations . The partial dislocations were generally divided into Frank–Shockley partial dislocations with b = 1/6⟨202̅3⟩, depending on their mobile characteristics …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caillard and Martin believed that these constrictions caused the local expansion of the dislocation core on the adjacent glide planes, corresponding to the formation of an intrinsic stacking fault I 1 that is enclosed between two partial dislocations. 34 The partial dislocations were generally divided into Frank−Shockley partial dislocations with b = 1/6⟨202̅ 3⟩, depending on their mobile characteristics. 35 Figure 7 illustrates the thermally activated nucleation of Shockley partials under the conditions of T = 2200 K and σ yx = 3 GPa.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Pt dewetted particle, the two segments lie in a (101̅) plane. As the particle has been formed after dewetting at high temperature (1000 °C), it is possible that the dislocations form at high temperature during the cooling process (thermal stress) as slip in {110} planes is known to be thermally activated . Several groups have observed a nonoctahedral slip in Pt in the past and during deformation (see for examples, refs. , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%