1992
DOI: 10.1016/0740-0020(92)80060-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some biochemical changes during soybean and pea tempeh fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was found by van der Riet et al . (), the increase of proteins amount by about 30%, also Nowak and Szebiotko () found 20% increase using the soybeans and peas as material for the fermentation. Song et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A similar trend was found by van der Riet et al . (), the increase of proteins amount by about 30%, also Nowak and Szebiotko () found 20% increase using the soybeans and peas as material for the fermentation. Song et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Nowak and Szebiotko (1992) reported a reduction in the concentration of protein during the fermentation but Murata et al (1967) found little change or an increase. Again, in both cases the data was presented as YO (w/w) of dry matter of sample examined and it is not possible to establish what proportion of the original protein and amino acids were utilised by the mould for growth.…”
Section: J Sci Food Agricmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The mould also hydrolyses proteins and the concentration of free amino acids increases during the fermentation from 2 g kg-' dry matter in the unfermented 523 cotyledons to 20-50 g kg-' in the tempe (Murata et al 1967;Nowak and Szebiotko 1992). Nowak and Szebiotko (1992) reported a reduction in the concentration of protein during the fermentation but Murata et al (1967) found little change or an increase.…”
Section: J Sci Food Agricmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The proteins produced by mold might have a similar molecular weight to that of buckwheat protein. Therefore, the strength of some bands at 48 h was appeared to increase, as compared with 16 h. In addition, several investigators reported the total protein content during tempeh fermentation Nowak and Szebiotko (1992) observed a slight increase in total protein from 45.1% to 48.8% (w/w of dry matter) and Van der Riet, Wight, Cilliers, and Datel (1987) reported the total protein increased from 40.1 to 49.3% (w/w of dry matter). Immunobloting analysis described the level of speciWc IgE in relation to buckwheat allergy as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mineralmentioning
confidence: 91%