2004
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x04000545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Calabi–Yau threefolds with obstructed deformations over the Witt vectors

Abstract: Some smooth Calabi-Yau threefolds in characteristic two and three that do not lift to characteristic zero are constructed. These threefolds are pencils of supersingular K3-surfaces. The construction depends on Moret-Bailly's pencil of abelian surfaces and Katsura's analysis of generalized Kummer surfaces. The threefold in characteristic two turns out to be nonrigid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be a close relation between our family of K3 surfaces and the family studied in [32]. Then we have 4 = 2 2 rational points in the generic fiber and again three fibers of typeD 4 , and this leads to σ 0 = 1.…”
Section: Proposition 92 Our Supersingular K3 Surface X Has Artin Insupporting
confidence: 64%
“…There seems to be a close relation between our family of K3 surfaces and the family studied in [32]. Then we have 4 = 2 2 rational points in the generic fiber and again three fibers of typeD 4 , and this leads to σ 0 = 1.…”
Section: Proposition 92 Our Supersingular K3 Surface X Has Artin Insupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As explained before, it is known that there are non-liftable projective Calabi-Yau threefolds in characteristics 2 and 3 (cf. [7] and [16]). It remains to prove the corresponding fact for Calabi-Yau spaces in characteristics 29, 61 and 71.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After the first results of Hirokado [7] and Schröer [16], there were constructions of non-liftable Calabi-Yau spaces along these lines by Schoen [15] and independently by the first author and van Straten [4]. These constructions are based on specific models as double octics or fiber products of rational elliptic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Without loss of generality we may assume that A = kJx, yK, and that the action is given by x → −x and y → −y (see, for example, [13,Lemma 5.4]). The invariant ring is then kJx 2 , xy, y 2 K. Set D i = q(C i ), and let a ∈ S/{±1} be the closed point.…”
Section: Proof Let E (P) Be the Néron Model Of E (P)mentioning
confidence: 99%