Proceedings of Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME 1965
DOI: 10.2523/1301-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Calculations for Effecting Oilfield Stimulation by Nuclear Means

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded: (1) in the absence of mechanical mixing, the fluid in the more permeable central column w a s purged more nearly in accordance with the "displacement" theory, ( 2 ) the experimental setup was not perfect, in that flow through the fine sand could be variable over the surface of the cylinder, (3) it is likely that production of radioactive gas f r o m nuclear chimneys in gas-bearing r o c k w i l l be influenced by several processes such a s : decay of effluent concentrations; (b) nonuniform production from the chimney walls; and (c) intermittent r a t e s of production required by other constraints. All of these factors w i l l tend to make the r e a l field observations fall between the extremes presented by the two theoretical models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded: (1) in the absence of mechanical mixing, the fluid in the more permeable central column w a s purged more nearly in accordance with the "displacement" theory, ( 2 ) the experimental setup was not perfect, in that flow through the fine sand could be variable over the surface of the cylinder, (3) it is likely that production of radioactive gas f r o m nuclear chimneys in gas-bearing r o c k w i l l be influenced by several processes such a s : decay of effluent concentrations; (b) nonuniform production from the chimney walls; and (c) intermittent r a t e s of production required by other constraints. All of these factors w i l l tend to make the r e a l field observations fall between the extremes presented by the two theoretical models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%