1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1987.tb00108.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Empirical Evidence On the Outliers and the Non‐Normal Distribution of Financial Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second reason why financial ratios may not be normally distributed is because the sample is not homogeneous (C. Lee, 1985;Ezzamel et al, 1987;So, 1987). Ratios have been shown to be dependent on the industry, e.g., with some industries having structurally higher current ratios than others.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second reason why financial ratios may not be normally distributed is because the sample is not homogeneous (C. Lee, 1985;Ezzamel et al, 1987;So, 1987). Ratios have been shown to be dependent on the industry, e.g., with some industries having structurally higher current ratios than others.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different distribution have been proposed, including the Gamma distribution (Frecka & Hopwood, 1983), the Cauchy distribution and the Student distribution (McLeay, 1986), and the stable Pareto distribution (So, 1987). All of these are variations of the Gaussian distribution, but allow for the occurrence of more extreme values.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes Box-Cox transformations (e.g., Ezzamel & Mar-Molinero, 1990;Mcleay & Omar, 2000;Watson, 1990), logarithmic transformations (e.g., Cowen & Hoffer, 1982;Deakin, 1976;Sudarsanam & Taffler, 1995), transformations by ranges (e.g., Kane et al, 1998), by square roots (e.g., Deakin, 1976;Frecka & Hopwood, 1983;Martikainen, Perttunen, Yli-Olli & Gunasekaran, 1995), by generalized risk box (e.g., Bahiraie, Azhar & Ibrahim, 2010), and other processing methods, such as weight of evidence (e.g., Nikolic, ZarkicJoksimovic, Stojanovski & Joksimovic, 2013), outlier trimming (e.g., Ezzamel & Mar-Molinero, 1990;Frecka & Hopwood, 1983;Lev & Sunder, 1979;Martikainen et al, 1995;So, 1987;Watson, 1990), and outlier winsorization (e.g., Lev & Sunder, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is a full-length mirror reflecting their state of affairs. This tool has very crucial role in decisions regarding companies' trading, investments and financing (Conner, 1973).…”
Section: Introduce the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%