1969
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90374-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some factors affecting the fractionation and mobility of RNA in agar gel electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a second centrifugation gives better resolution of the 40S fraction from the soluble region, which inevitably merges into the 40S region to some extent during zonal centrifugation of post-mitochondrial supernatant. Agar-gel electrophoresis (Tsanev et al, 1969;Hinton & Dessev, 1973) of RNA from different regions on the slowand fast-sedimentation sides of the peak showed that the change in radioactivity across the peak was due to change in the specific radioactivity of 18 S RNA, little or no RNA of other sizes being detectable. However, some of this approximately 18 S RNA might be mRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a second centrifugation gives better resolution of the 40S fraction from the soluble region, which inevitably merges into the 40S region to some extent during zonal centrifugation of post-mitochondrial supernatant. Agar-gel electrophoresis (Tsanev et al, 1969;Hinton & Dessev, 1973) of RNA from different regions on the slowand fast-sedimentation sides of the peak showed that the change in radioactivity across the peak was due to change in the specific radioactivity of 18 S RNA, little or no RNA of other sizes being detectable. However, some of this approximately 18 S RNA might be mRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the mobility was independent of size for DNA molecules larger than ∼400 base pairs (bp) 5, and varied with ionic strength 3, 5 and the identity and valence of the cation in the background electrolyte 2, 3. At about the same time, inspired by the separation of proteins in synthetic gel matrices 6–10, other investigators began to use similar matrices to separate RNA 11–19 and DNA molecules 15, 20–24 by molecular mass. The separation matrices included agar 11, 18, 20, 21, agarose 22, 23, polyacrylamide 13, 14, 19, 24–28 and composite agarose‐acrylamide 16, 17 gels.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At about the same time, inspired by the separation of proteins in synthetic gel matrices 6–10, other investigators began to use similar matrices to separate RNA 11–19 and DNA molecules 15, 20–24 by molecular mass. The separation matrices included agar 11, 18, 20, 21, agarose 22, 23, polyacrylamide 13, 14, 19, 24–28 and composite agarose‐acrylamide 16, 17 gels. As electrophoretic methods were improved by the purification of agarose 29–31 and the use of slab gels instead of tube gels 25, 32, and as the discovery of restriction enzymes allowed the preparation of monodisperse DNA fragments of known size 33, 34, it became apparent that the separation of DNA fragments by molecular mass depended on the gel matrix in which the separation was carried out 33, 35.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subunits were obtained by centrifugation in a sucrose-density gradient (8-240/,) after dissociation by 0.02 mM EDTA in 10 mM Tris buffer pH 7.5 [14]. Ribosomal protein was obtained by means of extraction with LiC1-urea solution [16]. The free RNAs were separated by agar-gel electrophoresis [ 161. tRNA was prepared from liver [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%