1956
DOI: 10.2307/1539012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Factors Controlling the Ingestion of Carbohydrates by the Blowfly

Abstract: Diet selection and preference are commonly evaluated in terms of quantity of food consumed; however, measurements of intake alone give little information concerning the degree to which different factors participate in the regulation of ingestion. It is clear in the case of insects that a sequential contribution by various stimuli governs the finding of food, the initiation of biting or sampling, the continuance of feeding, and the termination of feeding. It is believed by some (e.g., 208

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests a synergetic effect between glucose and fructose on the feeding response of female A. gambiae that is mediated by the sucrose taste neurone in the labellar trichoid T1 sensillum, a phenomenon already described for the blowfly Phormia regina (Dethier et al, 1956;Omand and Dethier, 1969) and the mosquitoes Culiseta inornata (Schmidt and Friend, 1991) and A. aegypti (Ignell et al, 2010). The fact that the sucrose labellar neurone of A. gambiae is activated by sucrose or by a mixture of glucose plus fructose but not by glucose or fructose alone suggests that it expresses distinct domains for glucose and fructose that both require activation to obtain a response from the neurone.…”
Section: Sensing and Feeding On Sucrose By A Gambiaesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This suggests a synergetic effect between glucose and fructose on the feeding response of female A. gambiae that is mediated by the sucrose taste neurone in the labellar trichoid T1 sensillum, a phenomenon already described for the blowfly Phormia regina (Dethier et al, 1956;Omand and Dethier, 1969) and the mosquitoes Culiseta inornata (Schmidt and Friend, 1991) and A. aegypti (Ignell et al, 2010). The fact that the sucrose labellar neurone of A. gambiae is activated by sucrose or by a mixture of glucose plus fructose but not by glucose or fructose alone suggests that it expresses distinct domains for glucose and fructose that both require activation to obtain a response from the neurone.…”
Section: Sensing and Feeding On Sucrose By A Gambiaesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As is known, sweet stimuli are important for feeding behaviour, as reported for instance in Rhagoletis indifferens (Yee 2003) and Phormia regina (Dethier et al 1956); in contrast, salty stimuli are fundamental for the regulation of electrolyte homeostasis (Lindemann 1996;Hiroi et al 2004).…”
Section: Electrophysiologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the winter mosquito C. inornata, sucrose is the best sugar feeding stimulant followed by melezitose and an equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose (Schmidt and Friend 1991). Glucose and fructose also show synergism in the feeding responses of the yellow fever mosquito, A. aegypti (Ignell et al 2010), and of the blowfly Phormia regina (Dethier et al 1956). …”
Section: Neurophysiology Of Sugar-sensitive Neurones In a Gambiaementioning
confidence: 99%