1968
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214428441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Frobenius theorems in global analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is continuous and the evaluation map ev 1 : A slightly weaker version of the preceding theorem can already be found in [Les68]. Note that it applies in particular to gauge groups of G-bundles over M. We have added the assumption that G is locally exponential because this is needed for the standard constructions of charts of the group C r (M, G) (cf.…”
Section: (G1) G N Is a Smooth Banach Manifold Modeled On E N (G2) Gmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…is continuous and the evaluation map ev 1 : A slightly weaker version of the preceding theorem can already be found in [Les68]. Note that it applies in particular to gauge groups of G-bundles over M. We have added the assumption that G is locally exponential because this is needed for the standard constructions of charts of the group C r (M, G) (cf.…”
Section: (G1) G N Is a Smooth Banach Manifold Modeled On E N (G2) Gmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here we adopt the definition of Leslie [5], [6] for the differentiability of mappings between Fréchet spaces. However, the differentiability proposed by Kriegl and P. Michor [4] is also suited to our study.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new connection coincides with the original one ω having the same local forms with respect to the sections {s a } a∈A (for details and the relevant proofs see [2]). Note also that for the differentiability of mappings between Fréchet spaces we adopt the definition of J. Leslie ([6], [7]). However, the differentiability proposed by A. Kriegl and P. Michor in [8] fits also to our case.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%