1971
DOI: 10.1080/00029238.1971.11080808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Guidelines for Assessment of Spikes and Sharp Waves in EEG Tracings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous IFCN definitions of IEDs were conceptual, 20 , 21 lacking specific rules for clinical implementation. Maulsby 22 proposed a set of practical guidelines for assessment of IEDs. Many of them translate to the current criteria: “Every spikey-looking wave is an artifact unless there are one or more good reasons for suspecting otherwise” (similar to criterion 3 in source space); IEDs “occupy a definable electrical field on the scalp” (similar to criterion 6 in sensor space); IEDs “are followed by a slow wave or series of slow deflections” (criterion 4 in sensor space); ignore sharp transients “which can be logically explained by simple alterations in voltage of the existing background rhythm” (criterion 2 in sensor space).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous IFCN definitions of IEDs were conceptual, 20 , 21 lacking specific rules for clinical implementation. Maulsby 22 proposed a set of practical guidelines for assessment of IEDs. Many of them translate to the current criteria: “Every spikey-looking wave is an artifact unless there are one or more good reasons for suspecting otherwise” (similar to criterion 3 in source space); IEDs “occupy a definable electrical field on the scalp” (similar to criterion 6 in sensor space); IEDs “are followed by a slow wave or series of slow deflections” (criterion 4 in sensor space); ignore sharp transients “which can be logically explained by simple alterations in voltage of the existing background rhythm” (criterion 2 in sensor space).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Normal sharp transients are often misread as IEDs. 2,6,14 There have been several attempts to develop criteria for identifying IEDs, 3,5,7,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) has recently proposed an operational definition of IEDs. 23 However, these criteria have not yet been clinically validated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For interpreting the IEDs we used the guidelines adopted by Maulsby (1971). Physiological sharp waves (vertex transients, K-complexes), EKG artifact, and environmental artifacts, as well as electrode artifacts, were identified and excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both awake and anesthetized mice we imaged a 8 Â 8 mm field of view through an intact transparent skull preparation. iGluSnFR demonstrates rapid and robust kinetics during cortical representation of sensory stimulation, that is then paralleled in spontaneous cortical activity with maps recovered up to alpha frequencies (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). iGluSnFR also resolved other features of sensory processing such as an intracortical rebound during the processing visual stimuli that was not seen with other GECIs.…”
Section: Brain-0489mentioning
confidence: 92%