1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(82)80033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some like it hot: A temporal analysis of hedonic responses to chili pepper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only recently have the sensory and perceptual characteristics of chemical irritation in the mouth begun to be explored systematically, and ethanol has not been among the compounds studied. Researchers have usually focused instead on two irritants that appear in peppers: capsaicin (e.g., Green, 1986;Lawless, 1984;Rozin, Ebert, & Schull, 1982;Stevens & Lawless, 1986) and piperine (e.g., Lawless, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently have the sensory and perceptual characteristics of chemical irritation in the mouth begun to be explored systematically, and ethanol has not been among the compounds studied. Researchers have usually focused instead on two irritants that appear in peppers: capsaicin (e.g., Green, 1986;Lawless, 1984;Rozin, Ebert, & Schull, 1982;Stevens & Lawless, 1986) and piperine (e.g., Lawless, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when one unimodal stimulus (here, CO 2 ) arouses a sensation of pain, this intrinsically painful feature becomes part of the integrated percept of a familiar object or food. As suggested by Rozin et al [34], the memory representation of this food may thus inhibit the pain or warning value of the trigeminal input (CO 2 here), and even make it desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In line with these notions, analysis of hedonic responding to events and stimuli over time has often suggested that informative differences between individuals and/or experimental conditions are reflected in time dynamics rather than in static measures of liking/disliking (Rozin, Ebert, & Schull, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%