2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x17002035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some needed psychological clarifications on the experience(s) of shamanism

Abstract: The target article's use of core concepts is confused and excessively broad. Two main types of experiences have been described in relation to shamanism: magical flight and mediumship/possession. The first refers to visual and remembered experiences of events in other realms, the second to embodied experiences of ceding mental control and personality to a preternatural entity. These experiences grossly correspond to two main experience modalities exhibited by highly hypnotizable individuals in a secular setting. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). It is also worth noting that SP is intrinsically an embodied alteration of consciousness (Cardeña ; Seligman ; Halloy ; ; Pierini ; ; Schmidt 2016), often elicited by robust bodily interactions (Rouget ) rather than a mostly imaginal state (Cardeña and Krippner ).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Case Of Marcosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). It is also worth noting that SP is intrinsically an embodied alteration of consciousness (Cardeña ; Seligman ; Halloy ; ; Pierini ; ; Schmidt 2016), often elicited by robust bodily interactions (Rouget ) rather than a mostly imaginal state (Cardeña and Krippner ).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Case Of Marcosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis helps differentiate SP from "trance" experiences in which the person experiences losing control but not becoming a different self with personal history and characteristics (Cardeña et al 2009). It is also worth noting that SP is intrinsically an embodied alteration of consciousness (Cardeña 1989;Seligman 2010;Halloy 2012;Pierini 2016a;2016b;Schmidt 2016), often elicited by robust bodily interactions (Rouget 1980) rather than a mostly imaginal state (Cardeña and Krippner 2018).…”
Section: The Selves Of Marcos: a Psychological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%