1963
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91191-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some physical investigations of the behaviour of bacterial surfaces VI. Chemical modification of surface components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…stirred in methanol-ether for 3 hr, but omitting diazomethane (curve B). Similar results-although with a less pronounced shoulder-have been reported for the bacteria Aerobacter aerogenes (Gittens & James, 1963) and Bacillus subtilis cell walls (Best & Durham, 1965). …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…stirred in methanol-ether for 3 hr, but omitting diazomethane (curve B). Similar results-although with a less pronounced shoulder-have been reported for the bacteria Aerobacter aerogenes (Gittens & James, 1963) and Bacillus subtilis cell walls (Best & Durham, 1965). …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…All buffer solutions were used at a final ionic strength ( I ) of 0-05. The following buffer solutions were used for pH/mobility curves (Gittens & James, 1963): below pH 2.6, HCl and NaCl; pH 2.6-9.6, NaCl+ sodium acetate + sodium barbiturate + HCl; above pH 9.6, NaCl + sodium acetate + diazomethane was prepared from N-methyl-N-nitr oso-p-t oluenesulp honamide (De Boer & Backer, 1954). Methylated and control cell walls were incorporated into KBr discs and the infra-red spectra recorded on a Perkin Elmer 237 spectrophotometer.…”
Section: Micro-ezectrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophoretic mobility is dependent on the ionic strength of the suspending medium, so care was taken to ensure that the ionic strength of each buffer was constant and identical; all buffer solutions had a final ionic strength (I) of 0-05 moll-'. The buffer solutions used for measuring the electrophoretic mobility of spores were HCI and NaCl for pH 2; NaCI, sodium acetate, sodium barbiturate and HCI for pH 3 to 9; NaCI, sodium acetate, sodium barbiturate and NaOH for pH 10 and 11 (Gittens & James, 1963). All buffers were made up in double-distilled water.…”
Section: E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each mobility value was the mean of at least 20 observations. Mobilities of organisms were measured using suspensions (10 ml) containing approximately 0.5 mg dry wt (10' organisms) ml -l. The buffers used (Gittens & James, 1963) were NaCl/HCl (pH I -5 to 2.0) or NaCl/sodium acetate/sodium barbiturate/ HCl (PH 3.0 to 9.0), and had an ionic strength of 0.05 or 0.005. The conductivity of each buffer was measured using a Griffin conductivity bridge (Griffin & George, Wembley, Middlesex).…”
Section: Analysis Of Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%